• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing Quality in Interventional Practice: Identifying Meaningful and Actionable Metrics.评估介入治疗实践中的质量：确定有意义且可付诸行动的指标。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 5;25(2):58. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502058. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
A quality framework for the role of invasive, non-interventional cardiologists in the present-day cardiac catheterization laboratory: A multidisciplinary SCAI/HFSA expert consensus statement.用于指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时代心内科医生角色的质量框架：多学科心血管造影与介入学会/心衰协会专家共识声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1356-1364. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27841. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Variation in practice and concordance with guideline criteria for length of stay after elective percutaneous coronary intervention.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后住院时间的实践差异及与指南标准的一致性
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):715-722. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26992. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
4
Women in interventional cardiology: Update in percutaneous coronary intervention practice patterns and outcomes of female operators from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry®.介入心脏病学领域的女性：来自美国国家心血管数据注册库®的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实践模式及女性操作者结局的最新情况
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87(4):663-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26118. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
A Survey of Interventional Cardiologists' Attitudes and Beliefs About Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）公众报告的介入心脏病学家态度和信念的调查。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):629-634. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1095.
6
The interventional care for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Establishing indicators for optimal interventional care.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的介入护理：建立最佳介入护理指标。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Mar;49(3):102361. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102361. Epub 2023 Dec 24.
7
What do we mean by complex percutaneous coronary intervention? An assessment of agreement amongst interventional cardiologists for defining complexity.我们所说的复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是什么意思？介入心脏病学家在定义复杂性方面的一致性评估。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jul;102(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30684. Epub 2023 May 20.
8
Current Perspectives and Practices on Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉介入治疗的当前观点与实践
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Feb;30(2):43-50. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
9
Indian Perspective on De-escalation from Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Single Antiplatelet Therapy Study: A Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Study among Indian Interventional Cardiologists.印度关于双联抗血小板治疗向单联抗血小板治疗降级的观点：印度介入心脏病学家的知识、态度和实践研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Apr;72(4):68-78. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0515.
10
Procedural variation in the performance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a SCAI-based survey study of US interventional cardiologists.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作差异：一项基于美国心血管造影和介入学会的美国介入心脏病学家调查研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Apr 1;83(5):721-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25276. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI.血管内影像学指导或血管造影指导下的复杂 PCI。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
2
Training Interventional Cardiologists: Seeking Better Than How We Have Always Done it.培训介入心脏病专家：寻求比我们一贯做法更好的方式。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Feb 13;16(3):258-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.12.020.
3
Overcoming Obstacles in Designing and Sustaining a High-Quality Cardiovascular Procedure Environment.克服设计和维持高质量心血管手术环境中的障碍。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 14;13(23):2806-2810. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
4
Performance Metrics to Improve Quality in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Practice.
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):859-860. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0904.
5
Proposed Framework for the Optimal Measurement of Quality Assessment in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗质量评估的最佳测量建议框架。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;4(10):963-964. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3228.
6
Focused update of expert consensus statement: Use of invasive assessments of coronary physiology and structure: A position statement of the society of cardiac angiography and interventions.专家共识声明重点更新：冠状动脉生理与结构的侵入性评估应用：心脏血管造影和介入学会立场声明
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):336-347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27672. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
2016 Revision of the SCAI position statement on public reporting.心血管造影和介入学会（SCAI）关于公开报告的立场声明2016年修订版
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 1;89(2):269-279. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26818. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology: a position statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, part 1: standards for quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology.介入心脏病学中的质量评估与改进：心血管造影和介入学会的立场声明，第1部分：介入心脏病学质量评估与改进标准
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun 1;77(7):927-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22982. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
9
Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的死亡率风险预测：来自国家心血管数据注册中心 588398 例手术的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 4;55(18):1923-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.005.
10
A longitudinal assessment of coronary interventional program quality: a report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry.冠状动脉介入治疗项目质量的纵向评估：美国心脏病学会-国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):136-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.012.

评估介入治疗实践中的质量：确定有意义且可付诸行动的指标。

Assessing Quality in Interventional Practice: Identifying Meaningful and Actionable Metrics.

作者信息

Klein Lloyd W

机构信息

Cardiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 5;25(2):58. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502058. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2502058
PMID:39077330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11263148/
Abstract

Interventional cardiologists should insist on quality assessment techniques that indisputably reflect the merit of care delivered. Only measurable outcomes and metrics that are modifiable should be identified and collected. An evaluation process should be adopted that genuinely appraises clinical practice, incorporating appropriate benchmarks for comparison.

摘要

介入心脏病学家应坚持采用能无可争议地反映所提供医疗服务质量的评估技术。应仅识别和收集可衡量且可改变的结果及指标。应采用一个能真正评估临床实践的评估过程，并纳入适当的比较基准。