Stuedemann J A, Franzluebbers A J
J. Phil Campbell Sr. Natural Resource Conservation Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Watkinsville, GA 30677, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2007 May;85(5):1340-50. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-723. Epub 2007 Jan 15.
Performance and production of growing cattle (Bos taurus) on Coastal Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] pasture are affected by forage allowance, but possible interactions with fertilizer nutrient source (i.e., inorganic vs. organic) and time have not been well described. We evaluated the effects of 3 nutrient sources with equivalent N rates: 1) inorganic, 2) crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) cover crop plus inorganic, and 3) chicken (Gallus gallus) broiler litter, factorially arranged with 2 residual forage mass levels [grazing to maintain high (4,528 +/- 1,803 kg/ha) and low (2,538 +/- 1,264 kg/ha) forage mass], on cattle stocking density, ADG, and BW gain during 5 consecutive summer grazing seasons. Across grazing seasons, residual forage mass and nutrient source both affected response variables, but interactions between these variables were rarely significant (P < or = 0.10). Across grazing seasons and nutrient sources, increasing grazing pressure to maintain a lower forage mass reduced ADG (0.67 vs. 0.88 kg/d; P < 0.001) but increased BW gain/ha (726 vs. 578 kg/ha; P < 0.001) due to greater stocking density (8.7 vs. 5.8 steers/ha, P < 0.001; mean BW of growing Angus steers of 212 kg). Inorganic fertilization led to greater stocking density than other nutrient sources (8.2 vs. 6.8 steers/ha, P < 0.001) because of greater forage production. Stocking density to achieve the 2 targeted forage mass levels was widely different during the initial grazing seasons of the study but nearly similar at the end of 5 yr. Cattle performance tended to decline with time during each grazing season under both residual forage mass levels, perhaps as a result of declining forage quality, because performance was positively associated with grazing season precipitation under high forage mass. Steer BW gain/ha was greater (P < 0.05) with lower forage mass early in the grazing season of all years but not necessarily later in the grazing season. Steer BW gain/ha was also greater (P < 0.05) with a lower forage mass during the early years of the study but was similar during the later years of the study. Significant variations in cattle performance and production with time confirmed the short-term seasonal effects but suggested that the long-term effects may also be of importance in maintaining productivity and environmental quality of grazed pastures.
在海岸百慕大草(狗牙根)牧场上生长的肉牛(Bos taurus)的生产性能受采食量影响,但与肥料养分来源(即无机肥与有机肥)和时间的可能相互作用尚未得到充分描述。我们评估了3种氮素用量相当的养分来源的效果:1)无机肥;2)绛车轴草(Trifolium incarnatum L.)覆盖作物加无机肥;3)鸡(Gallus gallus)肉鸡粪,与2个剩余牧草质量水平[放牧以维持高(4528±1803千克/公顷)和低(2538±1264千克/公顷)牧草质量]进行析因排列,对连续5个夏季放牧季节的牛饲养密度、平均日增重(ADG)和体重增加的影响。在整个放牧季节,剩余牧草质量和养分来源均影响响应变量,但这些变量之间的相互作用很少显著(P≤0.10)。在整个放牧季节和养分来源中,增加放牧压力以维持较低的牧草质量会降低ADG(0.67对0.88千克/天;P<0.001),但由于饲养密度增加(8.7对5.8头/公顷,P<0.001;生长中的安格斯阉牛平均体重212千克),体重增加/公顷增加(726对578千克/公顷;P<0.001)。由于牧草产量更高,无机肥施肥导致的饲养密度高于其他养分来源(8.2对6.8头/公顷,P<0.001)。在研究的初始放牧季节,达到2个目标牧草质量水平的饲养密度差异很大,但在5年末几乎相似。在两种剩余牧草质量水平下,每个放牧季节牛的生产性能都倾向于随时间下降,这可能是由于牧草质量下降,因为在高牧草质量下,生产性能与放牧季节降水量呈正相关。在所有年份的放牧季节早期,较低的牧草质量下阉牛体重增加/公顷更大(P<0.05),但在放牧季节后期不一定如此。在研究的早期年份,较低的牧草质量下阉牛体重增加/公顷也更大(P<0.05),但在研究的后期年份相似。牛生产性能和产量随时间的显著变化证实了短期季节性影响,但表明长期影响在维持放牧牧场的生产力和环境质量方面也可能很重要。