Merten T, Friedel E, Mehren G, Stevens A
Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Berlin.
Nervenarzt. 2007 May;78(5):511-2, 514-6, 518-20. doi: 10.1007/s00115-006-2101-3.
Although symptom validity tests have become available to German test users during the last few years, there is very little research into measures of negative response bias in personality assessment. The present study investigates the effects of negative response bias as measured by the Word Memory Test (WMT) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) on self-report personality scales. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from 93 patients who had undergone neuropsychiatric assessment in the context of independent medical examination. Complete data sets were available for the WMT, the SIMS, and the Freiburg Personality Inventory-Revised (FPI-R). Significant differences were found for a number of personality scales, depending on WMT and SIMS classification. The FPI-R validity scale (Openness) was linked to neither WMT nor SIMS, whereas the results in the latter two instruments showed a significant overlap of classification results (phi=0.44). A principal axis analysis yielded corresponding results. It is concluded that self-report personality measures may be considerably distorted by negative response bias. FPI-R Openness scale scores do not allow any interpretation in terms of negative response bias. More effort should be directed in German-speaking countries towards the development and validation of appropriate validity scales.
尽管在过去几年中症状效度测试已可供德国测试用户使用,但在人格评估中对消极反应偏差测量的研究却非常少。本研究调查了用单词记忆测试(WMT)和伪装症状结构化量表(SIMS)测量的消极反应偏差对自陈式人格量表的影响。对93名在独立医学检查背景下接受神经精神病学评估的患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。可获得WMT、SIMS和修订版弗莱堡人格量表(FPI-R)的完整数据集。根据WMT和SIMS分类,在一些人格量表上发现了显著差异。FPI-R效度量表(开放性)与WMT和SIMS均无关联,而后两种工具的结果显示分类结果有显著重叠(phi=0.44)。主成分分析得出了相应结果。得出的结论是,消极反应偏差可能会严重扭曲自陈式人格测量。FPI-R开放性量表得分无法根据消极反应偏差进行任何解释。在德语国家,应更加努力地开发和验证适当的效度量表。