Meszaros Anna, Tixier Marie-Stéphane, Cheval Brigitte, Barbar Ziad, Kreiter Serge
Unité d'Ecologie animale et de Zoologie agricole, Laboratoire d'Acarologie, ENSA.M--INRA, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier cedex 01, France.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2007;41(1-2):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-9046-x. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
Two species of Phytoseiidae are found in the same agroecosystem: Typhlodromus exhilaratus prevails in vine plots, while T. phialatus prevails in uncultivated surrounding areas. The objective of the present paper was to investigate whether the poor settlement of T. phialatus in vine plots can be explained by intraguild predation of these two species and/or cannibalism. Predatory abilities of the females on larvae and protonymphs were studied under laboratory conditions. A first experiment was conducted with only conspecific or heterospecific phytoseiid prey, in a second experiment Tetranychus urticae eggs were added to the phytoseiid prey. Oviposition, prey consumption, and escape rates of females were recorded. Oviposition and intraguild predation rates were higher for T. exhilaratus than for T. phialatus. Typhlodromus exhilaratus consumed fewer conspecifics than heterospecific phytoseiids, and oviposited when feeding on both diets. Typhlodromus phialatus consumed equal amounts of con- and heterospecifics. Although these two generalist predators belong to the type III defined by McMurtry and Croft (Annual Review of Entomology 42:291-321, 1997), our results suggest that they have different predation behaviour. However, because these results were obtained in experiments where no choice was given between the two phytoseiid species, they are difficult to link to previous studies conducted on the intraguild predation of the Phytoseiidae. The greater voracity and prolificacy of T. exhilaratus could partially explain the poor settlement of T. phialatus in vineyards and the predominance of T. exhilaratus. However, a full understanding of this phenomenon will require the study of other factors, such as susceptibility to pesticides and micro-climatic conditions, as well as the ability to cope with different food sources and host plants.
活跃盲走螨在葡萄园占优势,而瓶形盲走螨在未开垦的周边区域占优势。本文的目的是研究瓶形盲走螨在葡萄园定居不佳是否可以用这两种物种的种内捕食和/或同类相食来解释。在实验室条件下研究了雌螨对幼虫和若螨的捕食能力。第一个实验仅使用同种或异种的植绥螨科猎物,在第二个实验中,将二斑叶螨卵添加到植绥螨科猎物中。记录了雌螨的产卵量、猎物消耗量和逃逸率。活跃盲走螨的产卵量和种内捕食率高于瓶形盲走螨。活跃盲走螨消耗的同种个体比异种植绥螨少,并且在两种食物上取食时都会产卵。瓶形盲走螨消耗的同种和异种个体数量相等。尽管这两种广食性捕食者属于麦克默特里和克罗夫特(《昆虫学年评》42:291 - 321,1997)定义的III型,但我们的结果表明它们具有不同的捕食行为。然而,由于这些结果是在没有让这两种植绥螨科物种进行选择的实验中获得的,因此很难与之前关于植绥螨科种内捕食的研究联系起来。活跃盲走螨更强的贪食性和繁殖力可以部分解释瓶形盲走螨在葡萄园中定居不佳以及活跃盲走螨占优势的现象。然而,要全面理解这一现象,还需要研究其他因素,如对农药的敏感性和微气候条件,以及应对不同食物来源和寄主植物的能力。