Barbar Ziad, Tixier Marie-Stéphane, Kreiter Serge
Montpellier Sup Agro - INRA, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations n 1062, bâtiment 16, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France.
Exp Appl Acarol. 2007;42(2):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s10493-007-9084-z. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
Two species of Phytoseiidae predominated in and around vineyards in an experimental site in the south of France: Typhlodromus exhilaratus is the dominant species on grapes, whereas T. phialatus occurs in the uncultivated areas surrounding these crops. To help understand their distribution, this study aims to determine their susceptibility to a fungicide (dimethomorph + mancozeb) and an insecticide (chlorpyriphos-ethyl), which have been widely used at the experimental site for at least four years. The hypothesis tested is that the effects of these two pesticides differ between T. exhilaratus and T. phialatus. Two populations of T. exhilaratus, one collected on a vine crop where the two pesticides were applied and the other in an unsprayed orchard of Sorbus domestica, and one population of T. phialatus collected on Viburnum tinus from uncultivated areas adjacent to the vine crop, were tested under laboratory conditions. The fungicide seems to affect the females of T. phialatus more than those of T. exhilaratus from vine. However, at the recommended field concentration the female mortality rates of the three strains were low and female fecundities were not significantly different. Conversely, mortality rates were very high for the three strains at the recommended field concentration of chlorpyrifos-ethyl. The strain of T. exhilaratus from vine seems to be more tolerant and 20% of females survived the recommended field rate. This suggests better survival after insecticide application than females of T. phialatus (100% mortality at a lower concentration than the recommended rate). As extrapolation of laboratory results to the field is often irrelevant, these differences could be just one of several factors affecting the spatial segregation of the two species in the agrosystem considered. Possible explanations other than pesticides for the poor settlement of T. phialatus in vine plots are discussed.
在法国南部一个试验场的葡萄园及其周边,两种植绥螨科物种占主导地位:活跃盲走螨是葡萄上的优势物种,而菲氏盲走螨则出现在这些作物周围的未开垦区域。为了有助于了解它们的分布情况,本研究旨在确定它们对一种杀菌剂(烯酰吗啉+代森锰锌)和一种杀虫剂(毒死蜱-乙基)的敏感性,这两种药剂在试验场已广泛使用至少四年。所检验的假设是,这两种农药对活跃盲走螨和菲氏盲走螨的影响有所不同。在实验室条件下,对活跃盲走螨的两个种群进行了测试,一个种群采自施用了这两种农药的葡萄园作物,另一个种群采自未喷洒农药的欧洲花楸果园;还对采自葡萄园附近未开垦区域的荚蒾上的一个菲氏盲走螨种群进行了测试。这种杀菌剂似乎对菲氏盲走螨雌螨的影响比对来自葡萄园的活跃盲走螨雌螨的影响更大。然而,在推荐的田间浓度下,三个品系的雌螨死亡率较低,且雌螨繁殖力没有显著差异。相反,在毒死蜱-乙基的推荐田间浓度下,三个品系的死亡率都非常高。来自葡萄园的活跃盲走螨品系似乎更具耐受性,20%的雌螨在推荐田间剂量下存活了下来。这表明在施用杀虫剂后,活跃盲走螨雌螨的存活率高于菲氏盲走螨雌螨(在低于推荐剂量的较低浓度下,菲氏盲走螨雌螨死亡率为100%)。由于将实验室结果外推至田间往往并不相关,这些差异可能只是影响所考虑的农业生态系统中这两个物种空间隔离的几个因素之一。文中还讨论了除农药外,菲氏盲走螨在葡萄园地块中定居较少的可能原因。