新斯的明诱导健康志愿者近端胃餐后阶段性收缩及消化不良样症状。
Neostigmine-induced postprandial phasic contractility in the proximal stomach and dyspepsia-like symptoms in healthy volunteers.
作者信息
Di Stefano Michele, Vos Rita, Klersy Catherine, Lee Kwang Jae, Janssens Jozef, Tack Jan
机构信息
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, IRCCS S. Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy.
出版信息
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2797-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00883.x.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
In a subset of functional dyspepsia patients, we have recently described the association between unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractions of the proximal stomach and a specific symptom pattern. To better elucidate the role of phasic contractility of the proximal stomach in symptom generation, we aimed at inducing this motility pattern in healthy volunteers and we carefully monitored symptom onset.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Eleven healthy volunteers underwent gastric barostat on two separate days. Gastric tone and phasic contractility were evaluated for a 90-minute period. In particular, after 30 min of basal recording, a caloric liquid meal and neostigmine 0.5 mg IV or saline in a double-blind, randomized, crossover protocol were administered. During the measurement, severity of 9 dyspeptic symptoms was evaluated on a visual analog scale. Computer-aided baseline reconstruction allowed us to quantify phasic contractions as a motility index (MI), reflecting the area between signal and baseline normalized over time. Perception of contractions after placebo or neostigmine was evaluated. Moreover, we tested for influence of gastric tone and phasic contractility on symptoms.
RESULTS
After neostigmine, gastric accommodation was not different than after placebo (225 +/- 36 vs 206 +/- 76 mL, P= NS). During the first 30-min postprandial period, the MI was significantly higher after neostigmine than after placebo (26.4 +/- 3 vs 21.4 +/- 3, P < 0.001), confirming the induction of unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractions. The postprandial total symptom score was significantly higher after neostigmine compared to saline; several individual postprandial symptom scores were also significantly higher after neostigmine-compared placebo. After neostigmine, a higher percentage of postprandial contractions was perceived compared to placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
Unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractility of the proximal stomach is a mechanism potentially involved in the pathogenesis of dyspeptic symptoms.
背景与目的
在一部分功能性消化不良患者中,我们最近描述了近端胃餐后不被抑制的相性收缩与特定症状模式之间的关联。为了更好地阐明近端胃相性收缩力在症状产生中的作用,我们旨在使健康志愿者产生这种运动模式,并仔细监测症状发作情况。
患者与方法
11名健康志愿者在两天内分别接受胃内压测定。评估90分钟内的胃张力和相性收缩力。具体而言,在基础记录30分钟后,按照双盲、随机、交叉方案给予热液体餐和0.5mg新斯的明静脉注射或生理盐水。在测量过程中,采用视觉模拟量表评估9种消化不良症状的严重程度。计算机辅助基线重建使我们能够将相性收缩量化为运动指数(MI),反映信号与基线之间随时间归一化的面积。评估安慰剂或新斯的明后对收缩的感知。此外,我们测试了胃张力和相性收缩力对症状的影响。
结果
新斯的明治疗后,胃容纳能力与安慰剂治疗后无差异(225±36 vs 206±76 mL,P=无统计学意义)。在餐后最初30分钟内,新斯的明治疗后的MI显著高于安慰剂治疗后(26.4±3 vs 21.4±3,P<0.001),证实诱导出了不被抑制的餐后相性收缩。新斯的明治疗后的餐后总症状评分显著高于生理盐水治疗后;与安慰剂相比,新斯的明治疗后的几个个体餐后症状评分也显著更高。与安慰剂相比,新斯的明治疗后感觉到的餐后收缩百分比更高。
结论
近端胃不被抑制的餐后相性收缩力是消化不良症状发病机制中可能涉及的一种机制。