Suppr超能文献

系统评价:阿片类药物治疗慢性背痛:患病率、疗效及与成瘾的关联

Systematic review: opioid treatment for chronic back pain: prevalence, efficacy, and association with addiction.

作者信息

Martell Bridget A, O'Connor Patrick G, Kerns Robert D, Becker William C, Morales Knashawn H, Kosten Thomas R, Fiellin David A

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8025, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jan 16;146(2):116-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-2-200701160-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence, efficacy, and risk for addiction for persons receiving opioids for chronic back pain are unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of opioid treatment, whether opioid medications are effective, and the prevalence of substance use disorders among patients receiving opioid medications for chronic back pain.

DATA SOURCES

English-language studies from MEDLINE (1966-March 2005), EMBASE (1966-March 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (to 4th quarter 2004), PsychInfo (1966-March 2005), and retrieved references.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that studied an adult, nonobstetric sample; used oral, topical, or transdermal opioids; and focused on treatment for chronic back pain.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently extracted data and determined study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Opioid prescribing varied by treatment setting (range, 3% to 66%). Meta-analysis of the 4 studies assessing the efficacy of opioids compared with placebo or a nonopioid control did not show reduced pain with opioids (g, -0.199 composite standardized mean difference [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11]; P = 0.136). Meta-analysis of the 5 studies directly comparing the efficacy of different opioids demonstrated a nonsignificant reduction in pain from baseline (g, -0.93 composite standardized mean difference [CI, -1.89 to -0.03]; P = 0.055). The prevalence of lifetime substance use disorders ranged from 36% to 56%, and the estimates of the prevalence of current substance use disorders were as high as 43%. Aberrant medication-taking behaviors ranged from 5% to 24%.

LIMITATIONS

Retrieval and publication biases and poor study quality. No trial evaluating the efficacy of opioids was longer than 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioids are commonly prescribed for chronic back pain and may be efficacious for short-term pain relief. Long-term efficacy (> or =16 weeks) is unclear. Substance use disorders are common in patients taking opioids for back pain, and aberrant medication-taking behaviors occur in up to 24% of cases.

摘要

背景

接受阿片类药物治疗慢性背痛的人群中,其成瘾的患病率、疗效及风险尚不清楚。

目的

确定阿片类药物治疗的患病率、阿片类药物是否有效,以及接受阿片类药物治疗慢性背痛患者中物质使用障碍的患病率。

数据来源

来自MEDLINE(1966年 - 2005年3月)、EMBASE(1966年 - 2005年3月)、Cochrane临床对照试验中心注册库(至2004年第4季度)、PsychInfo(1966年 - 2005年3月)的英文研究以及检索到的参考文献。

研究选择

研究成年非产科样本;使用口服、外用或透皮阿片类药物;并专注于慢性背痛治疗的文章。

数据提取

两名研究人员独立提取数据并确定研究质量。

数据综合

阿片类药物的处方率因治疗环境而异(范围为3%至66%)。对4项评估阿片类药物与安慰剂或非阿片类对照疗效的研究进行的荟萃分析未显示阿片类药物能减轻疼痛(g,综合标准化均数差为 -0.199 [95% CI,-0.49至0.11];P = 0.136)。对5项直接比较不同阿片类药物疗效的研究进行的荟萃分析表明,与基线相比疼痛有非显著性减轻(g,综合标准化均数差为 -0.93 [CI,-1.89至 -0.03];P = 0.055)。终生物质使用障碍的患病率在36%至56%之间,当前物质使用障碍患病率的估计高达43%。异常服药行为的发生率在5%至24%之间。

局限性

检索和发表偏倚以及研究质量差。没有评估阿片类药物疗效的试验超过16周。

结论

阿片类药物常用于慢性背痛的治疗,可能对短期疼痛缓解有效。长期疗效(≥16周)尚不清楚。物质使用障碍在服用阿片类药物治疗背痛的患者中很常见,高达24%的病例存在异常服药行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验