Sullivan Dennis H, Roberson Paula K, Smith Eugene S, Price J Allen, Bopp Melinda M
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jan;55(1):20-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.01010.x.
To determine the independent and combined effects of progressive resistance muscle strength training (PRMST) and megestrol acetate (MA) on strength, muscle mass, and function in older recuperative care patients.
Double-blind, randomized, controlled intervention using a two-by-two factorial design and conducted between 1999 and 2001.
University-affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs hospital.
Twenty-nine patients (mean age 79.4 +/- 7.4, 90% white) aged 65 and older and had recent functional decline.
After randomization to one of four treatment groups (low-resistance exercises plus 800 mg per day of MA or a placebo or high-intensity PRMST plus 800 mg/d of MA or placebo), subjects received training and the drug or placebo for 12 weeks.
Change in muscle strength, mid-thigh muscle area, and aggregate functional performance score as assessed using analysis of covariance.
Five subjects withdrew from the study before its completion. Based on intent-to-treat analyses, subjects who received high-intensity PRMST and placebo experienced the greatest strength gains. The addition of MA was associated with worse outcomes than with high-intensity exercise training alone, especially with regard to the leg exercises. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that subjects who received high-intensity PRMST and placebo experienced significantly greater percentage increases in leg strength than subjects in either of the MA treatment groups (P<.05 for each comparison). There was also a significant negative effect of MA on physical function. In general, subjects who received MA experienced a deterioration in aggregate physical function scores, whereas the remaining subjects improved (-0.80+/-0.40 vs 0.48+/-0.41, P=.04). There was not a significant interaction between exercise and MA for any outcome.
High-intensity PRMST is a safe and well-tolerated exercise regimen for frail elderly patients. The addition of MA appears to blunt the beneficial effects of PRMST, resulting in less muscle strength and functional performance gains.
确定渐进性抗阻肌肉力量训练(PRMST)和醋酸甲地孕酮(MA)对老年康复护理患者的力量、肌肉质量和功能的独立及联合作用。
采用二乘二析因设计的双盲、随机、对照干预研究,于1999年至2001年进行。
大学附属退伍军人事务部医院。
29名年龄在65岁及以上且近期功能下降的患者(平均年龄79.4±7.4岁,90%为白人)。
随机分为四个治疗组之一(低阻力运动加每日800毫克MA或安慰剂,或高强度PRMST加每日800毫克MA或安慰剂)后,受试者接受为期12周的训练及药物或安慰剂治疗。
使用协方差分析评估肌肉力量、大腿中部肌肉面积和综合功能表现评分的变化。
5名受试者在研究完成前退出。基于意向性分析,接受高强度PRMST和安慰剂的受试者力量增加最大。添加MA与单独进行高强度运动训练相比,结果更差,尤其是在腿部运动方面。事后分析表明,接受高强度PRMST和安慰剂的受试者腿部力量的百分比增加显著高于MA治疗组中的任何一组(每次比较P<0.05)。MA对身体功能也有显著的负面影响。总体而言,接受MA的受试者综合身体功能评分恶化,而其余受试者有所改善(-0.80±0.40对0.48±0.41,P=0.04)。运动和MA之间在任何结果上均无显著交互作用。
高强度PRMST是一种对体弱老年患者安全且耐受性良好的运动方案。添加MA似乎会削弱PRMST的有益效果,导致肌肉力量和功能表现的提升减少。