Research Centre for Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine, Department of Sports and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Dec 3;12(23):24081-24100. doi: 10.18632/aging.202265.
The optimal pattern of sedentarism displacement and mechanisms underlying its health effects are poorly understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify muscle-tendon adaptation in response to two different sedentarism displacement interventions and relate any adaptations to functional outcomes. Thirty-four older women (73±5yrs) underwent skeletal muscle-tendon size and functional assessments. Participants were randomly allocated to: Sedentary behavior fragmentation (SBF), Light intensity physical activity (LIPA), or Control groups. Measures were taken at weeks 0 and 8. Gait speed significantly increased (p=0.003), in both experimental groups (SBF: 0.06 ± 0.08m/s, 6±10%, LIPA: 0.06 ± 0.07m/s, 6±6%), but not control (-0.02 ± 0.12m/s, -2±9%). Accordingly, the relative change in Vastus Lateralis muscle volume, accounted for 30% (p=0.027), and 45% (p=0.0006) of the explained variance in the relative change in gait speed, for SBF and LIPA respectively. Gastrocnemius Medialis fascicle length changes were positively associated with gait speed changes, following LIPA exclusively (R= 0.50, p=0.009). This is the first study to show SBF and LIPA are adequate loading in older women, with related muscle adaptation and clinically relevant gait speed improvements. Such adaptations appear similar irrespective of whether sedentarism displacement is prescribed in a single bout (LIPA) or in frequent micro-bouts (SBF).
久坐行为移位的最佳模式及其对健康影响的机制尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在定量研究肌肉-肌腱适应两种不同久坐行为移位干预的情况,并将任何适应与功能结果联系起来。34 名老年女性(73±5 岁)接受了骨骼肌-肌腱大小和功能评估。参与者被随机分配到:久坐行为碎片化(SBF)、低强度体力活动(LIPA)或对照组。在 0 周和 8 周时测量。步态速度显著增加(p=0.003),在两个实验组(SBF:0.06±0.08m/s,6±10%,LIPA:0.06±0.07m/s,6±6%),但对照组没有(-0.02±0.12m/s,-2±9%)。因此,股外侧肌体积的相对变化解释了步态速度相对变化的 30%(p=0.027)和 45%(p=0.0006),对于 SBF 和 LIPA 分别。腓肠肌内侧肌腱长度的变化与 LIPA 后的步态速度变化呈正相关(R=0.50,p=0.009)。这是第一项表明 SBF 和 LIPA 对老年女性是足够的负荷,具有相关的肌肉适应和临床相关的步态速度改善的研究。这种适应似乎与久坐行为移位是单次(LIPA)还是频繁的微移位(SBF)无关。