Zhang Hui, Arens Edward, Fard Sahar Abbaszadeh, Huizenga Charlie, Paliaga Gwelen, Brager Gail, Zagreus Leah
Center for the Built Environment, UC Berkeley, 390 Wurster Hall #1839, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1839, USA.
Int J Biometeorol. 2007 May;51(5):349-60. doi: 10.1007/s00484-006-0079-y. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
Office workers' preferences for air movement have been extracted from a database of indoor environmental quality surveys performed in over 200 buildings. Dissatisfaction with the amount of air motion is very common, with too little air movement cited far more commonly than too much air movement. Workers were also surveyed in a detailed two-season study of a single naturally ventilated building. About one-half the building's population wanted more air movement and only 4% wanted less. This same ratio applied when the air movement in workspaces was higher than 0.2 m/s, the de facto draft limit in the current ASHRAE and ISO thermal environment standards. Preference for "less air motion" exceeded that for "more" only at thermal sensations of -2 (cool) or colder. These results raise questions about the consequences of the ASHRAE and ISO standards' restrictions on air movement, especially for neutral and warm conditions.
办公室职员对空气流动的偏好已从200多座建筑物室内环境质量调查数据库中提取。对空气流动量不满的情况非常普遍,提到空气流动过少的情况远比空气流动过多更为常见。在对一座自然通风建筑进行的详细两季研究中,也对职员进行了调查。该建筑约一半的人员希望有更多的空气流动,只有4%的人希望空气流动减少。当工作空间内的空气流动速度高于0.2米/秒时,同样的比例也适用,这是当前美国采暖、制冷与空调工程师学会(ASHRAE)和国际标准化组织(ISO)热环境标准中的实际通风限制。只有在热感觉为-2(凉爽)或更冷时,对“较少空气流动”的偏好才超过对“较多空气流动”的偏好。这些结果引发了有关ASHRAE和ISO标准对空气流动限制的后果的疑问,尤其是在中性和温暖条件下。