Suppr超能文献

5岁以下儿童脑电双频指数与麻醉深度指数的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of Bispectral Index and Narcotrend Index in children below 5 years of age.

作者信息

Wallenborn Jan, Kluba Karsten, Olthoff Derk

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Feb;17(2):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02036.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring devices for assessing the depth of hypnosis is most difficult in children under 5 years of age.

METHODS

Forty five children aged 0-60 months were included in a prospective observational study. A direct comparison of the processed EEG variables Bispectral Index (BIS, version 3.4) and Narcotrend Index (NI, version 2.0AF) was to be achieved by simultaneous recording. The ability of these parameters to differentiate between various clinical states was evaluated by using the prediction probability (P(k)). Age-related effects on the BIS and NI were analyzed by dividing the children into three age groups: 0-6, 7-18 and 19-60 months.

RESULTS

The preanesthesia, conscious children were differentiated from anesthetized patients by the BIS and NI with no overlap (P(k) = 1.0). In the awake period the BIS was superior to the NI (P(k) to differentiate 'end of anesthesia' from 'awakening' was 0.97 vs 0.73 respectively; P = 0.002). Patients aged 7-18 months showed higher BIS and NI values in the course of anesthesia than the younger and older children (P = 0.001). On awakening, children aged 0-6 months showed the lowest mean BIS (n.s.) and NI (P = 0.006) values.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIS currently seems to be superior to the NI, but age-related processing algorithms of the raw EEG must be implemented in both BIS and NI in order to be useful in children younger than 5 years of age.

摘要

背景

使用脑电图(EEG)监测设备评估催眠深度在5岁以下儿童中最为困难。

方法

45名年龄在0至60个月的儿童纳入一项前瞻性观察研究。通过同步记录对处理后的EEG变量脑电双频指数(BIS,版本3.4)和脑状态指数(NI,版本2.0AF)进行直接比较。使用预测概率(P(k))评估这些参数区分不同临床状态的能力。通过将儿童分为三个年龄组:0至6个月、7至18个月和19至60个月,分析年龄对BIS和NI的影响。

结果

BIS和NI能够将麻醉前清醒儿童与麻醉患者区分开来,无重叠(P(k)=1.0)。在清醒期,BIS优于NI(区分“麻醉结束”与“苏醒”的P(k)分别为0.97和0.73;P=0.002)。7至18个月的患者在麻醉过程中显示出比年幼和年长儿童更高的BIS和NI值(P=0.001)。苏醒时,0至6个月的儿童平均BIS(无统计学意义)和NI值最低(P=0.006)。

结论

目前BIS似乎优于NI,但原始EEG的年龄相关处理算法必须在BIS和NI中都得以实施,以便用于5岁以下儿童。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验