Valeti Uma S, Nishimura Rick A, Holmes David R, Araoz Philip A, Glockner James F, Breen Jerome F, Ommen Steve R, Gersh Bernard J, Tajik A Jamil, Rihal Charanjit S, Schaff Hartzell V, Maron Barry J
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 23;49(3):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.055. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
This study sought to describe the acute morphologic differences that result from septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
Surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation relieve left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in severely symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
Cine and contrast-enhanced CMR images were obtained in HCM patients before and after septal myectomy (n = 24) and alcohol septal ablation (n = 24). Location of septal reduction, extent of myocardial necrosis, and conduction system abnormalities with each technique were compared.
With septal myectomy, there was a discrete area of resected tissue consistently localized to anterior septum. In contrast, alcohol septal ablation resulted in a more variable effect. In most patients, alcohol septal ablation caused a transmural region of tissue necrosis, located more inferiorly in the basal septum than myectomy and usually extending into the right ventricular side of the septum at the midventricular level. However, there were 6 patients after alcohol septal ablation in whom there was sparing of the basal septum with residual gradients at follow-up. After the procedure, left bundle branch block developed in 46% of septal myectomy patients, and right bundle branch block was evident in 58% of alcohol septal ablation patients.
Septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation for severely symptomatic, drug-refractory patients with obstructive HCM have different morphologic effects and location sites on left ventricular septal myocardium. Septal myectomy provides consistent resection of the obstructing portion of the anterior basal septum, whereas the effect of ethanol septal ablation is more variable. These findings may have important implications for patient selection and management as well as long-term outcome.
本研究旨在利用心脏磁共振成像(CMR)描述经室间隔心肌切除术和酒精室间隔消融术所导致的急性形态学差异。
外科室间隔心肌切除术和酒精室间隔消融术可缓解肥厚型心肌病(HCM)严重症状患者的左心室流出道梗阻。
在室间隔心肌切除术(n = 24)和酒精室间隔消融术(n = 24)前后,对HCM患者进行电影和对比增强CMR成像。比较每种技术的室间隔缩小位置、心肌坏死范围和传导系统异常情况。
经室间隔心肌切除术,有一个离散的切除组织区域始终定位于前间隔。相比之下,酒精室间隔消融术的效果更具变异性。在大多数患者中,酒精室间隔消融术导致透壁性组织坏死区域,位于基底间隔比心肌切除术更低的位置,并且通常在心室中部水平延伸至间隔的右心室侧。然而,有6例酒精室间隔消融术后患者基底间隔未受累,随访时有残余梯度。术后,46%的室间隔心肌切除术患者发生左束支传导阻滞,58%的酒精室间隔消融术患者出现右束支传导阻滞。
对于有严重症状、药物难治性梗阻性HCM患者,室间隔心肌切除术和酒精室间隔消融术对左心室间隔心肌有不同形态学影响和位置。室间隔心肌切除术可一致地切除前基底间隔的梗阻部分,而酒精室间隔消融术的效果更具变异性。这些发现可能对患者选择、管理以及长期预后具有重要意义。