• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对日间医院后续护理项目出院患者的随访研究。

A follow-up study of clients discharged from a day hospital aftercare program.

作者信息

Heinemann S H, Yudin L W, Perlmutter F

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;26(11):752-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.26.11.752.

DOI:10.1176/ps.26.11.752
PMID:172428
Abstract

Sixty-one former clients of a day hospital aftercare program were assessed for level of social and individual functioning. They were found to be more like psychiatric patients than like the normal population. Marital status and type of residential arrangement were the only demographic variables that could be correlated with level of functioning. Married clients functioned better than those who were not married, and boarding-home residents were significantly more impaired than those in other living situations. Although the data did not permit conclusions about the effectiveness of the aftercare program, they suggested the need for improved conditions in boarding homes.

摘要

对日间医院后续护理项目的61名 former clients 进行了社会和个人功能水平评估。结果发现,他们更像精神科患者,而不像正常人群。婚姻状况和居住安排类型是仅有的与功能水平相关的人口统计学变量。已婚患者的功能比未婚患者更好,寄宿家庭的居民比其他生活环境中的居民受损明显更严重。尽管数据无法得出关于后续护理项目有效性的结论,但它们表明需要改善寄宿家庭的条件。

注

原文中“former clients”不太明确准确意思,这里直接保留英文未翻译。

相似文献

1
A follow-up study of clients discharged from a day hospital aftercare program.一项针对日间医院后续护理项目出院患者的随访研究。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;26(11):752-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.26.11.752.
2
Community aftercare of patients discharged from Utah state hospital: a follow-up study.犹他州立医院出院患者的社区后续护理:一项随访研究。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1977 Feb;28(2):114-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.28.2.114.
3
Patients' views of placement facilities: a participant-observer study.患者对安置设施的看法:一项参与观察性研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1978 Mar;135(3):329-32. doi: 10.1176/ajp.135.3.329.
4
Short-term follow-up after brief inpatient treatment.短期住院治疗后的短期随访。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1975 Nov;26(11):741-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.26.11.741.
5
Using inpatient staff for aftercare of severely disturbed chronic patients.利用住院部工作人员对严重精神障碍的慢性病患者进行后续护理。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1973 Jul;24(7):482-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.24.7.482.
6
Postrelease adjustment of day and full-time psychiatric patients.日间和全日制精神病患者出院后的调整
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973 Nov;29(5):647-51. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200050058010.
7
One-year status of homeless mentally ill clients who completed a transitional residential program.完成过渡性住宿项目的无家可归精神病患者的一年状况。
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Feb;33(1):43-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1022465127183.
8
Landlord-supervised cooperative apartments: a new modality for community-based treatment.房东监督的合作公寓:一种基于社区治疗的新模式。
Am J Psychiatry. 1973 Feb;130(2):156-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.130.2.156.
9
Housing and nutrition of psychiatric aftercare patients.精神科后续护理患者的住房与营养
Am J Public Health. 1977 Feb;67(2):182-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.2.182.
10
From hospital to community. Six-month and two-year outcomes for 505 patients.从医院到社区。505名患者的6个月和2年结局。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984 Nov;172(11):667-73. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198411000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Community mental health treatment: what works for whom?社区心理健康治疗:对谁有效?
Psychiatr Q. 1979 Summer;51(2):119-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01064561.