Haglund K, van der Meiden E, von Knorring L, von Essen L
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Caring Sciences, University Hospital, University of Uppsala, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Feb;14(1):49-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01042.x.
The general aim was to describe the frequency of and the reasons for locked doors at wards within Swedish psychiatric care. A questionnaire was answered by 193 ward managers. The findings demonstrated that 73% (n = 193) of the wards were locked on the day of investigation. Wards were sometimes locked in the absence of committed patients and sometimes open in the presence of committed patients. Wards were more often locked if at least one committed patient was present. Fewer wards for children and adolescents, than for adults and old people, were locked. More wards in the areas of Sweden's three largest cities, than in the rest of the country, were locked. Fourteen categories of reasons for locking wards were generated by a content analysis of answers to an open-ended question. Most answers were categorized as: prevent patients from escaping, legislation, provide patients and others with safety and security, prevent import and unwelcome visits, and staff's need of control. Staff working in psychiatric care ought to reflect upon and articulate reasons for, and decisions about, locking or opening entrance doors, with the limitation of patients' freedom in mind.
总体目标是描述瑞典精神科护理病房门锁闭的频率及原因。193名病房管理人员回答了一份调查问卷。调查结果显示,在调查当天,73%(n = 193)的病房处于锁闭状态。病房有时在没有收治患者时锁闭,有时在有收治患者时开放。如果至少有一名收治患者在场,病房更常被锁闭。与成人和老年人病房相比,儿童和青少年病房被锁闭的情况较少。瑞典三大城市地区的病房比该国其他地区的病房更多被锁闭。通过对一个开放式问题答案的内容分析,得出了14类锁闭病房的原因。大多数答案被归类为:防止患者逃跑、法规要求、为患者及他人提供安全保障、防止外来人员和不受欢迎的探访以及工作人员的管控需求。精神科护理工作人员在考虑限制患者自由的情况下,应该思考并阐明锁闭或打开入口门的原因及决定。