Hazewinkel Mirjam C, de Winter Remco F P, van Est Roel W, van Hyfte Dirk, Wijnschenk Danny, Miedema Narda, Hoencamp Erik
Clinical Centre for Acute Psychiatry, Parnassia, Parnassia Group, The Hague, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 11;10:188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00188. eCollection 2019.
With the introduction of "Electronic Medical Record" (EMR) a wealth of digital data has become available. This provides a unique opportunity for exploring precedents for seclusion. This study explored the feasibility of text mining analysis in the EMR to eventually help reduce the use of seclusion in psychiatry. The texts in notes and reports of the EMR during 5 years on an acute and non-acute psychiatric ward were analyzed using a text mining application. A period of 14 days was selected before seclusion or for non-secluded patients, before discharge. The resulting concepts were analyzed using chi-square tests to assess which concepts had a significant higher or lower frequency than expected in the "seclusion" and "non-seclusion" categories. Text mining led to an overview of 1,500 meaningful concepts. In the 14 day period prior to the event, 115 of these concepts had a significantly higher frequency in the seclusion category and 49 in the non-seclusion category. Analysis of the concepts from days 14 to 7 resulted in 54 concepts with a significantly higher frequency in the seclusion-category and 14 in the non-seclusion category. The resulting significant concepts are comparable to reasons for seclusion in literature. These results are "proof of concept". Analyzing text of reports in the EMR seems therefore promising as contribution to tools available for the prediction of seclusion. The next step is to build, train and test a model, before text mining can be part of an evidence-based clinical decision making tool.
随着“电子病历”(EMR)的引入,大量数字数据变得可用。这为探索隔离先例提供了独特的机会。本研究探讨了在电子病历中进行文本挖掘分析的可行性,以最终帮助减少精神病学中隔离的使用。使用文本挖掘应用程序分析了急性和非急性精神科病房5年期间电子病历中的笔记和报告文本。在隔离前或对于未隔离的患者,选择出院前14天的时间段。使用卡方检验对所得概念进行分析,以评估哪些概念在“隔离”和“非隔离”类别中的出现频率显著高于或低于预期。文本挖掘得出了1500个有意义的概念概述。在事件发生前的14天期间,这些概念中有115个在隔离类别中的出现频率显著更高,49个在非隔离类别中。对第14天至第7天的概念分析得出,有54个概念在隔离类别中的出现频率显著更高,14个在非隔离类别中。所得的重要概念与文献中隔离的原因相当。这些结果是“概念验证”。因此,分析电子病历中的报告文本似乎有望为预测隔离的可用工具做出贡献。下一步是构建、训练和测试一个模型,然后文本挖掘才能成为基于证据的临床决策工具的一部分。