Suppr超能文献

一项关于慢性下肢静脉溃疡微生物学的前瞻性研究,以重新评估组织活检和拭子的临床预测价值。

A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs.

作者信息

Davies Charlotte E, Hill Katja E, Newcombe Robert G, Stephens Phil, Wilson Melanie J, Harding Keith G, Thomas David W

机构信息

Wound Biology Group, Cardiff Institute of Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2007 Jan-Feb;15(1):17-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00180.x.

Abstract

This study determined whether comprehensive microbiological analysis offered real predictive value in terms of healing outcome, and assessed the clinical usefulness of surface swabs vs. tissue biopsies for clinically noninfected leg wounds. The wound microflora of 70 patients with chronic venous leg ulcers was quantified after sampling by swabbing and biopsy. A highly significant association between wound surface area at 4 weeks and eventual healing at 6 months was found (p<0.001), although initial wound size, sex, height, and weight were not significant predictors of outcome (p>0.1). A significant association between healing and bacterial diversity in the wound as assessed by swab (p=0.023) was demonstrated. Furthermore, the bacterial density of wound surface area by swab (CFU/mL; p=0.018) or biopsy (CFU/g tissue; p=0.038) were shown to be independent predictors of nonhealing. Logistic regression showed that microbiological analysis of biopsies provided no additional prognostic information when compared with analysis of the surface microflora (p=0.27). Hence, if biopsies do not contribute significantly to patient management, their use should be discouraged in clinically noninfected wounds. Furthermore, independent predictors of healing, such as wound surface microbial diversity and density, could identify patients likely to have an unfavorable outcome and to whom resources should be targeted.

摘要

本研究确定了全面的微生物学分析在愈合结果方面是否具有实际预测价值,并评估了表面拭子与组织活检在临床上未感染的腿部伤口中的临床实用性。通过拭子采样和活检对70例慢性下肢静脉溃疡患者的伤口微生物群进行了定量分析。发现4周时的伤口表面积与6个月时的最终愈合之间存在高度显著的相关性(p<0.001),尽管初始伤口大小、性别、身高和体重并不是结果的显著预测因素(p>0.1)。通过拭子评估,伤口愈合与细菌多样性之间存在显著相关性(p=0.023)。此外,通过拭子(CFU/mL;p=0.018)或活检(CFU/g组织;p=0.038)评估的伤口表面积细菌密度被证明是非愈合的独立预测因素。逻辑回归显示,与表面微生物群分析相比,活检的微生物学分析没有提供额外的预后信息(p=0.27)。因此,如果活检对患者管理没有显著贡献,在临床上未感染的伤口中应避免使用。此外,愈合的独立预测因素,如伤口表面微生物多样性和密度,可以识别可能预后不良的患者,以及应将资源靶向的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验