Cohen Ted, Colijn Caroline, Finklea Bryson, Murray Megan
Division of Social Medicine and Health Inequalities, Brigham and Women's Hospital, One Brigham Circle, Boston, MA 02120, USA
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Jun 22;4(14):523-31. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0193.
Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to tuberculosis (TB) disease by one of the three possible routes: primary progression after a recent infection; re-activation of a latent infection; or exogenous re-infection of a previously infected individual. Recent studies show that optimal TB control strategies may vary depending on the predominant route to disease in a specific population. It is therefore important for public health policy makers to understand the relative frequency of each type of TB within specific epidemiological scenarios. Although molecular epidemiologic tools have been used to estimate the relative contribution of recent transmission and re-activation to the burden of TB disease, it is not possible to use these techniques to distinguish between primary disease and re-infection on a population level. Current estimates of the contribution of re-infection therefore rely on mathematical models which identify the parameters most consistent with epidemiological data; these studies find that exogenous re-infection is important only when TB incidence is high. A basic assumption of these models is that people in a population are all equally likely to come into contact with an infectious case. However, theoretical studies demonstrate that the social and spatial structure can strongly influence the dynamics of infectious disease transmission. Here, we use a network model of TB transmission to evaluate the impact of non-homogeneous mixing on the relative contribution of re-infection over realistic epidemic trajectories. In contrast to the findings of previous models, our results suggest that re-infection may be important in communities where the average disease incidence is moderate or low as the force of infection can be unevenly distributed in the population. These results have important implications for the development of TB control strategies.
结核分枝杆菌感染可通过以下三种可能途径之一导致结核病(TB):近期感染后的原发性进展;潜伏感染的重新激活;或先前感染个体的外源性再感染。近期研究表明,最佳的结核病控制策略可能因特定人群中主要的发病途径而异。因此,对于公共卫生政策制定者来说,了解特定流行病学情况下每种类型结核病的相对频率非常重要。尽管分子流行病学工具已被用于估计近期传播和重新激活对结核病负担的相对贡献,但在人群层面上,无法使用这些技术区分原发性疾病和再感染。因此,目前对再感染贡献的估计依赖于识别与流行病学数据最一致参数的数学模型;这些研究发现,只有当结核病发病率很高时,外源性再感染才很重要。这些模型的一个基本假设是,人群中的每个人接触感染病例的可能性相同。然而,理论研究表明,社会和空间结构会强烈影响传染病传播的动态。在此,我们使用结核病传播的网络模型来评估非均匀混合对现实流行轨迹上再感染相对贡献的影响。与先前模型的结果相反,我们的结果表明,在平均疾病发病率为中度或低度的社区中,再感染可能很重要,因为感染力在人群中分布可能不均匀。这些结果对结核病控制策略的制定具有重要意义。