Suppr超能文献

系统评价显示饮食对2型糖尿病影响的证据有限。

Limited evidence for effects of diet for type 2 diabetes from systematic reviews.

作者信息

van de Laar F A, Akkermans R P, van Binsbergen J J

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Aug;61(8):929-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602611. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Systematic reviews are an appraised method to summarize research in a concise and transparent way, and may enable to draw conclusions beyond the sum of results of individual studies. We assessed the results, quality and external validity of systematic reviews on diet in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS: We systematically searched for systematic reviews on nutritional interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes that used a reproducible search strategy in at least one major database that applied some form of quality assessment. We assessed quality and the external validity of the retrieved systematic reviews. Outcomes were defined as statistical meta-analyses or narrative results using a predefined and reproducible method.

RESULTS

Six systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, investigating dietary interventions in general (n=3), chromium supplementation (n=1), fish-oil (n=1) or herbs and nutrition supplements (n=1). Quality assessment showed minimal/minor flaws in four cases and major/extensive flaws in two cases. All reviews had insufficient data needed to judge external validity. In reviews with minimal/minor flaws, we found beneficial effects of very-low-calorie diets and fish-oil supplements. However, the external validity of these results could not be assessed sufficiently.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic reviews largely failed to produce knowledge beyond the sum of the original studies. Furthermore, judgment of external validity was hampered in most cases owing to missing data. To improve the quality and usefulness of systematic reviews of dietary interventions, we recommend the application of more focused research questions, but with broader inclusion criteria, for example, the use of observational studies.

SPONSORSHIP

Internal funding Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre.

摘要

目的

系统评价是一种以简洁、透明的方式总结研究的评估方法,可能有助于得出超越个别研究结果总和的结论。我们评估了关于2型糖尿病患者饮食的系统评价的结果、质量和外部有效性。

设计、设置、研究对象:我们系统检索了关于2型糖尿病患者营养干预的系统评价,这些评价在至少一个主要数据库中使用了可重复的检索策略,并应用了某种形式的质量评估。我们评估了检索到的系统评价的质量和外部有效性。结果被定义为使用预定义的、可重复的方法进行的统计荟萃分析或叙述性结果。

结果

六项系统评价符合纳入标准,分别调查了一般饮食干预(n = 3)、铬补充剂(n = 1)、鱼油(n = 1)或草药和营养补充剂(n = 1)。质量评估显示,四项存在最小/轻微缺陷,两项存在主要/广泛缺陷。所有评价都缺乏判断外部有效性所需的数据。在存在最小/轻微缺陷的评价中,我们发现极低热量饮食和鱼油补充剂有有益效果。然而,这些结果的外部有效性无法得到充分评估。

结论

系统评价在很大程度上未能产生超出原始研究总和的知识。此外,由于数据缺失,大多数情况下外部有效性的判断受到阻碍。为了提高饮食干预系统评价的质量和实用性,我们建议应用更具针对性的研究问题,但采用更广泛的纳入标准,例如使用观察性研究。

资助

拉德堡德大学奈梅亨医学中心内部资金。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验