Yannakoulia Mary, Poulia Kalliopi-Anna, Mylona Eleni, Kontogianni Meropi D
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Harokopio University, 70 El. Venizelou St, 17671, Athens, Greece.
Rev Diabet Stud. 2007 Winter;4(4):226-30. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2007.4.226. Epub 2008 Feb 10.
The aim of this pilot study was to compare the effects of an intensive nutritional intervention with usual care conditions on dropout rate, body weight, lifestyle changes and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thirty outpatients with T2DM but without insulin treatment (mean age: 57 +/- 9 yr) were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups: intensive care (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients in the UC group were given advice about dietary and physical activity goals in one consultation session at baseline, while patients in the IC group attended five goal-oriented consultation sessions held approximately every two weeks from baseline onwards. Changes in body weight, T2DM knowledge, dietary intake, physical activity, HbA1c, and percentage of dropouts were evaluated at 1-year follow-up post-intervention. Fifty percent of patients quitted the program and were classified as "dropouts". Program completers were older and included a lower percentage of newly diagnosed T2DM compared with dropouts. A tendency to a negative association between attendance of the IC group and the likelihood of dropping out was found (p = 0.08). No difference was detected between UC and IC groups regarding changes in body weight, HbA1c or other outcome measures, at post-intervention or 1-year follow-up. This pilot study did not confirm advantages of intensive nutritional intervention in T2DM patients in terms of glycemic control, body weight, diet and physical activity. However, the high dropout rate may have hampered its effectiveness.
这项试点研究的目的是比较强化营养干预与常规护理条件对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的脱落率、体重、生活方式改变和血糖控制的影响。30名未接受胰岛素治疗的T2DM门诊患者(平均年龄:57±9岁)被随机分配到两个干预组之一:强化护理(IC)组或常规护理(UC)组。UC组患者在基线时的一次咨询会议上接受了关于饮食和体育活动目标的建议,而IC组患者从基线开始每两周左右参加一次为期五次的目标导向咨询会议。在干预后1年的随访中评估体重、T2DM知识、饮食摄入、体育活动、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和脱落率的变化。50%的患者退出了该项目,并被归类为“脱落者”。与脱落者相比,项目完成者年龄更大,新诊断的T2DM患者比例更低。发现IC组的参与率与脱落可能性之间存在负相关趋势(p = 0.08)。在干预后或1年随访时,UC组和IC组在体重、HbA1c或其他结局指标的变化方面未检测到差异。这项试点研究未证实强化营养干预在T2DM患者的血糖控制、体重、饮食和体育活动方面具有优势。然而,高脱落率可能阻碍了其有效性。