Roma Peter G, Silberberg Alan, Huntsberry Mary E, Christensen Chesley J, Ruggiero Angela M, Suomi Stephen J
Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA.
Am J Primatol. 2007 Sep;69(9):989-1000. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20404.
In Experiment 1, three capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) were exposed to a mirror in their home cage for 3 days and then given food treats for touching orange marks located on the surface of an experimental chamber. Following training, a mirror was added to the chamber to see if the monkeys would use it to guide non-reinforced contacts with an orange mark on their foreheads that was only visible as a mirror reflection (mark test). Two monkeys touched the head-mark more often with the mirror present than absent, but no mark touches were emitted while looking at the mirror. In Experiment 2, the monkeys were rewarded for touching orange marks on their bodies that were directly visible, followed by another head-mark test. Again, two monkeys touched the mark more often with the mirror present than absent, but these contacts were not emitted while looking at the mirror. Since facing the mirror while mark touching was not required for reinforcement during training, Experiment 3 further tested the possibility that increased mark touching in the presence of the mirror during Experiments 1 and 2 was the result of a memorial process. For this, a final, novel mark test was conducted using an orange mark on the neck that was only visible as a reflection (Experiment 3). No monkeys passed this test. These are the first mark tests given to capuchin monkeys. The results are consistent with the finding that no monkey species is capable of spontaneous mirror self-recognition. The implications of sequential training and mark testing for comparative evaluations of mirror self-recognition capacity are discussed.
在实验1中,三只卷尾猴(僧帽猴)在其饲养笼中接触一面镜子,为期3天,然后当它们触摸位于实验箱表面的橙色标记时给予食物奖励。训练之后,在实验箱中添加一面镜子,以观察猴子是否会利用它来引导自己与额头上仅在镜子反射中可见的橙色标记进行无强化接触(标记测试)。有两只猴子在有镜子时比没有镜子时更频繁地触摸头部标记,但在看着镜子时没有发出任何标记触摸行为。在实验2中,猴子触摸其身体上直接可见的橙色标记时会得到奖励,随后进行另一项头部标记测试。同样,有两只猴子在有镜子时比没有镜子时更频繁地触摸标记,但这些接触行为不是在看着镜子时发出的。由于在训练期间强化并不需要在触摸标记时面对镜子,实验3进一步测试了在实验1和实验2中镜子出现时标记触摸增加是记忆过程结果的可能性。为此,使用颈部的一个仅在反射中可见的橙色标记进行了最后一项新颖的标记测试(实验3)。没有猴子通过这项测试。这些是首次对卷尾猴进行的标记测试。结果与没有任何猴子物种能够自发进行镜像自我识别这一发现一致。讨论了顺序训练和标记测试对镜像自我识别能力比较评估的意义。