• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

龋齿众多:口腔健康状况是澳大利亚新抵达难民面临的一个主要问题。

Holes a plenty: oral health status a major issue for newly arrived refugees in Australia.

作者信息

Davidson N, Skull S, Calache H, Murray S S, Chalmers J

机构信息

Victorian Immigrant Health Program, Melbourne.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2006 Dec;51(4):306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00448.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00448.x
PMID:17256304
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental health needs of newly arrived refugees are much greater than for the wider Australian community. This paper identifies the disparities and highlights major dental health issues for Australia's growing and constantly changing refugee population.

METHODS

Using available data and the decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT) index as a measure of oral health, the reported oral health status of refugee groups in Australia was compared with that of the general population, Indigenous Australians, recipients of public dental services, special needs groups in Australia and other refugee groups outside Australia.

RESULTS

The reported oral health status of Australian refugees compared poorly with the comparison groups. Of particular concern was the number of reported untreated decayed teeth (D). This ranged from a mean of 2.0 to 5.2 compared with 0.6 to 1.4 for the general Australian population. Refugee groups also reported fewer filled teeth (1.0 to 5.8) compared with the general population (4.1 to 9.3). Similar results were found when reported D, M and F teeth for refugees were compared to Indigenous Australians, public dental service recipients, immigrants and special needs groups in Australia.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental health of refugees, particularly untreated decay, compared poorly to that of Indigenous Australians, and special needs populations in Australia who all have known worse dental health than the general population. There is an urgent need for the inclusion of this at risk population among targeted dental services. In addition, sources of health related data must clearly identify refugees to enable appropriate comparisons with other population groups. Recommendations for refugees are made regarding on-arrival dental assessment and treatment, and community based oral health programmes.

摘要

背景

新抵达的难民的口腔健康需求远高于澳大利亚广大社区。本文确定了差异,并突出了澳大利亚不断增长且持续变化的难民群体的主要口腔健康问题。

方法

利用现有数据,并将龋失补牙指数(DMFT)作为口腔健康的衡量指标,将澳大利亚难民群体报告的口腔健康状况与普通人群、澳大利亚原住民、公共牙科服务接受者、澳大利亚特殊需求群体以及澳大利亚境外的其他难民群体进行比较。

结果

与对照组相比,澳大利亚难民报告的口腔健康状况较差。特别令人担忧的是报告的未经治疗的龋齿数量(D)。这一数字的平均值在2.0至5.2之间,而澳大利亚普通人群的这一数字为0.6至1.4。与普通人群(4.1至9.3)相比,难民群体报告的补牙数量也较少(1.0至5.8)。当将难民报告的D、M和F牙齿数量与澳大利亚原住民、公共牙科服务接受者、移民和特殊需求群体进行比较时,也发现了类似的结果。

结论

难民的口腔健康,尤其是未经治疗的龋齿情况,与澳大利亚原住民以及澳大利亚特殊需求人群相比很差,而这些人群的口腔健康状况都已知比普通人群更差。迫切需要将这一高危人群纳入有针对性的牙科服务中。此外,与健康相关的数据来源必须明确识别难民,以便能够与其他人群进行适当比较。针对难民提出了关于抵达时牙科评估和治疗以及社区口腔健康计划的建议。

相似文献

1
Holes a plenty: oral health status a major issue for newly arrived refugees in Australia.龋齿众多:口腔健康状况是澳大利亚新抵达难民面临的一个主要问题。
Aust Dent J. 2006 Dec;51(4):306-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00448.x.
2
Dental caries of refugee children compared with US children.难民儿童与美国儿童的龋齿情况比较。
Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):e733-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0496.
3
Oral health comparisons between children attending an Aboriginal health service and a Government school dental service in a regional location.在某地区,接受原住民健康服务的儿童与接受政府学校牙科服务的儿童口腔健康状况比较。
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Apr-Jun;7(2):625. Epub 2007 May 2.
4
Aspects of tooth decay in recently arrived refugees.新抵达难民的龋齿问题
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Dec;24(6):623-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00529.x.
5
Oral health status among newly arrived refugees in Germany: a cross-sectional study.德国新抵达难民的口腔健康状况:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Aug 3;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0600-9.
6
Gaps in smiles and services: a cross-sectional study of dental caries in refugee-background children.笑容与服务的差距:一项针对具有难民背景儿童龋齿情况的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Jan 22;15:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-10.
7
Caries burden and efficacy of a referral pathway in a cohort of preschool refugee children.一群学龄前难民儿童的龋齿负担及转诊途径的效果
Aust Dent J. 2015 Mar;60(1):73-9. doi: 10.1111/adj.12269.
8
Caries experience among publicly-funded dental patients in Australia, 1995-96: type of care and geographic location.1995 - 1996年澳大利亚公费牙科患者的龋齿患病情况:护理类型和地理位置
Aust Dent J. 2000 Mar;45(1):37-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00240.x.
9
Oral health of Indigenous adult public dental patients in Australia.澳大利亚成年原住民公立牙科患者的口腔健康状况
Aust Dent J. 2007 Dec;52(4):322-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00509.x.
10
Oral health status and treatment needs in immigrants and refugees in Italy.意大利移民和难民的口腔健康状况及治疗需求
Eur J Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;12(4):359-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00145298.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral health, quality of life and general health of people from refugee and asylum-seeking backgrounds from South Asia and the Middle East resettled in South Australia: a cross sectional survey.对重新安置在南澳大利亚的南亚和中东难民及寻求庇护者背景人群的口腔健康、生活质量和总体健康状况的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 15;25(1):1796. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22907-w.
2
Characteristics of Self-Rated Oral Health among Syrian Refugee Parents in Ontario.安大略省叙利亚难民父母自评口腔健康特征
Int J Dent. 2023 Nov 24;2023:4136520. doi: 10.1155/2023/4136520. eCollection 2023.
3
A scoping review linking early childhood caries to violence, neglect, internally displaced, migrant and refugee status.
一项范围综述将幼儿龋病与暴力、忽视、国内流离失所、移民和难民身份联系起来。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03459-0.
4
Oral health in an urban slum, Nigeria: residents' perceptions, practices and care-seeking experiences.尼日利亚城市贫民窟的口腔健康:居民的认知、行为和求医体验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03303-5.
5
Oral Health as a Refugee Health Right.口腔健康作为一项难民健康权利。
Int Dent J. 2023 Oct;73(5):593-594. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.06.013. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Patterns and predictors of public dental service utilisation among refugees in Victoria, Australia: a latent profile and multilevel analysis.澳大利亚维多利亚州难民公共牙科服务利用的模式和预测因素:潜在剖面和多层次分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02886-3.
7
Factors affecting oral health care for asylum seekers and refugees in England: a qualitative study of key stakeholders' perspectives and experiences.影响英国寻求庇护者和难民口腔医疗保健的因素:对关键利益相关者观点和经历的定性研究
Br Dent J. 2022 Jun 8:1-7. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4340-5.
8
Exploring the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of a torture, abuse and dental anxiety service in Norway: a realist evaluation.探索挪威酷刑、虐待和牙科焦虑服务的背景、机制和结果:一项实际评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07913-7.
9
Oral Health Status among Migrants from Middle- and Low-Income Countries to Europe: A Systematic Review.从中低收入国家移民到欧洲的人口的口腔健康状况:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;18(22):12203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212203.
10
Eritrean Refugees' and Asylum-Seekers' Attitude towards and Access to Oral Healthcare in Heidelberg, Germany: A Qualitative Study.厄立特里亚难民和寻求庇护者对德国海德堡口腔医疗保健的态度及获取情况:一项定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111559.