• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[α1-抗胰蛋白酶和酸性α1-糖蛋白在结直肠癌中的敏感性和特异性]

[Sensitivity and specificity of alpha-1-antitrypsin and acid alpha-1-glycoprotein in colorectal carcinoma].

作者信息

Putzki H, Hafner O

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeinchirurgie, Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Gastroenterol J. 1991;51(3-4):104-7.

PMID:1725848
Abstract

In a group of 80 patients with colorectal cancer and a control group of 91 persons and in 15 patients with acute diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon acid alpha-1-glycoprotein (AGP) and alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) were measured. The median of AAT in the carcinoma group was 3.34 g/l, in the control group 2.39 g/l. AGP was in the carcinoma group 1.19 g/l, in the control group 0.79 g/l. Both differences are significant. The sensitivities of AGP and AAT were compared with the sensitivities of CEA and CA 19/9 using ROC-curves. AAT and AGP have a distinctly lower sensitivity than CEA, but only on the basis of a high specificity of 95%. In the region of lower specificities AAT has the highest sensitivity. Therefore, the sensitivity of CEA for colorectal carcinoma is not reached by AAT and AGP, when a high specificity of the test is required. The relevance of AAT and AGP determinations is further reduced because in the diverticulitis group the levels were as high as in the carcinoma group.

摘要

对80例结直肠癌患者、91名对照者以及15例乙状结肠急性憩室炎患者测定了酸性α-1-糖蛋白(AGP)和α-1-抗胰蛋白酶(AAT)。癌组AAT的中位数为3.34 g/l,对照组为2.39 g/l。癌组AGP为1.19 g/l,对照组为0.79 g/l。两者差异均有统计学意义。采用ROC曲线比较了AGP和AAT与癌胚抗原(CEA)和CA 19/9的敏感性。AAT和AGP的敏感性明显低于CEA,但仅基于95%的高特异性。在较低特异性区域,AAT具有最高的敏感性。因此,当要求检测具有高特异性时,AAT和AGP未达到CEA对结直肠癌的敏感性。由于憩室炎组的水平与癌组一样高,AAT和AGP测定的相关性进一步降低。

相似文献

1
[Sensitivity and specificity of alpha-1-antitrypsin and acid alpha-1-glycoprotein in colorectal carcinoma].[α1-抗胰蛋白酶和酸性α1-糖蛋白在结直肠癌中的敏感性和特异性]
Gastroenterol J. 1991;51(3-4):104-7.
2
The role of acute-phase reactant proteins, carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 as a marker in the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: a prospective clinical study.急性期反应蛋白、癌胚抗原和CA 19-9作为结直肠癌术前分期标志物的作用:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int Surg. 1996 Apr-Jun;81(2):136-9.
3
The importance of monitoring colorectal adenomas by tumor markers (ROC analysis).通过肿瘤标志物监测结直肠腺瘤的重要性(ROC分析)。
Med Pregl. 1993;46 Suppl 1:69-71.
4
[CEA, CA 19.9 and CA 195 in patients with colorectal carcinoma. ROC analysis].[结直肠癌患者的癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19.9和糖类抗原195。ROC分析]
Rev Esp Med Nucl. 1999 Aug;18(4):281-6.
5
[The value of tumor markers in colorectal cancer].[肿瘤标志物在结直肠癌中的价值]
Leber Magen Darm. 1989 Jan;19(1):18-25.
6
[Acute-phase proteins in colorectal cancer].
Med Interna. 1992;44(2-4):41-6.
7
Detection of blood-borne cells in colorectal cancer patients by nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA: longitudinal analyses and demonstration of its potential importance as an adjunct to multiple serum markers.通过巢式逆转录聚合酶链反应检测结直肠癌患者血源细胞中的癌胚抗原信使核糖核酸:纵向分析及其作为多种血清标志物辅助手段的潜在重要性的论证
Cancer Res. 2001 Mar 15;61(6):2523-32.
8
Clinical evaluation of M43: a novel cancer-associated mucin epitope.M43的临床评估:一种新型癌症相关黏蛋白表位
Cancer Res. 1993 Jun 15;53(12):2803-9.
9
The significance of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in the detection of colorectal carcinoma recurrence.癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9和糖类抗原72-4在结直肠癌复发检测中的意义
Anticancer Res. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6D):5237-44.
10
[Comparative studies on the value of acute phase proteins and CA-125 for monitoring patients with ovarian cancer].
Strahlenther Onkol. 1988 Dec;164(12):724-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement and analysis of unbound drug concentrations.游离药物浓度的测定与分析。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Jun;30(6):445-62. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630060-00003.