Rein E B, Filtvedt M, Walløe L, Raeder J C
Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, N-0317 Oslo, Norway.
Br J Anaesth. 2007 Mar;98(3):331-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael369. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
Conflicting results have been obtained when using heat and constant negative pressure applied to the arm to induce re-warming in patients with mild hypothermia due to surgery. We hypothesized that pulsating negative pressure would increase skin blood flow and thus heat transfer. The purpose of this study was to compare a new method of applying heat and pulsating negative pressure to the skin with conventional forced-air warming for preventing perioperative hypothermia.
Twenty patients undergoing prolonged laparotomy for gastric surgery were randomized into two groups. One group (SM) received hospital standard method: forced-air warming, 43 degrees C (Bair Hugger) on the thoracic and upper arm surface. The other group (NM) received the new method: warm water and pulsating negative pressure treatment applied in a transparent acrylic cylinder (50 x 16 cm) on one arm. The cylinder was circulated with water at 42.5 degrees C, leaving an air pocket inside the device. Pulsating pressure between 0 and -40 mm Hg was generated in the air pocket inside the cylinder.
Two groups of 10 patients were studied. Warming was started shortly after induction of general anaesthesia. The two methods performed similarly during the first 60 min, with a mean 0.7 degrees decrease in core temperature. The tympanic temperature curve in NM group then increased and returned to baseline (37 degrees C) by 120 min. The temperature of SM group increased more slowly, reaching 36 degrees C by 120 min (P < 0.05).
Warm water and pulsating negative pressure was significantly better at treating hypothermia during laparotomy than forced-air warming.
对于因手术导致轻度体温过低的患者,使用热疗和持续负压作用于手臂以诱导复温时,得到的结果相互矛盾。我们推测脉动负压会增加皮肤血流量,从而促进热量传递。本研究的目的是比较一种将热疗和脉动负压应用于皮肤的新方法与传统的强制空气加温法在预防围手术期体温过低方面的效果。
20例接受长时间开腹胃癌手术的患者被随机分为两组。一组(SM组)采用医院标准方法:在胸部和上臂表面使用43摄氏度的强制空气加温(Bair Hugger)。另一组(NM组)采用新方法:在一个透明丙烯酸圆柱形容器(50×16厘米)中对一只手臂进行温水和脉动负压治疗。容器内循环的水温为42.5摄氏度,容器内部留有气腔。在容器内部的气腔中产生0至 -40毫米汞柱的脉动压力。
对两组各10例患者进行了研究。全身麻醉诱导后不久开始加温。在前60分钟内,两种方法的效果相似,核心体温平均下降0.7摄氏度。然后NM组的鼓膜温度曲线上升,并在120分钟时恢复到基线(37摄氏度)。SM组的体温上升较慢,在120分钟时达到36摄氏度(P < 0.05)。
在开腹手术期间治疗体温过低方面,温水和脉动负压疗法明显优于强制空气加温法。