Leung K K, Lai A, Wu A
Department of Anaesthesia, United Christian Hospital, China.
Anaesthesia. 2007 Jun;62(6):605-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05021.x.
A randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of upper body forced-air warming (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical model 500/OR, Prairie, MN) with that of an electric heating pad (Operatherm 202, KanMed, Bromma, Sweden) for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature in 60 patients undergoing laparotomy under general anaesthesia. The nasopharyngeal temperature was recorded throughout the operative period. The mean (SD) final temperatures were 36.2 (0.4) degrees C with forced-air warming and 35.5 (1.0) degrees C with electric heating pad (p < 0.01). Upper body forced-air warming is more effective than the heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during laparotomy.
进行了一项随机对照试验，比较上半身强制空气加温（Bair Hugger，奥古斯汀医疗500/OR型号，明尼苏达州普雷里）与电加热垫（Operatherm 202，瑞典布罗玛的KanMed）对60例全身麻醉下行剖腹手术患者术中体温维持的效果。在整个手术期间记录鼻咽温度。强制空气加温组的平均（标准差）最终体温为36.2（0.4）摄氏度，电加热垫组为35.5（1.0）摄氏度（p<0.01）。上半身强制空气加温在剖腹手术中维持体温方面比加热垫更有效。
