Barden Jeremy, Lawrenson Lesley, Poole Jennifer G, Kim Jeannie, Wray D Walter, Bailey Damian M, Richardson Russell S
Department of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, Univeesity of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0623, USA.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 May;292(5):H2491-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01396.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
To further explore the limitations to maximal O(2) consumption (.VO(2 max)) in exercise-trained skeletal muscle, six cyclists performed graded knee-extensor exercise to maximum work rate (WR(max)) in hypoxia (12% O(2)), hyperoxia (100% O(2)), and hyperoxia + femoral arterial infusion of adenosine (ADO) at 80% WR(max). Arterial and venous blood sampling and thermodilution blood flow measurements allowed the determination of muscle O(2) delivery and O(2) consumption. At WR(max), O(2) delivery rose progressively from hypoxia (1.0 +/- 0.04 l/min) to hyperoxia (1.20 +/- 0.09 l/min) and hyperoxia + ADO (1.33 +/- 0.05 l/min). Leg .VO(2 max) varied with O(2) availability (0.81 +/- 0.05 and 0.97 +/- 0.07 l/min in hypoxia and hyperoxia, respectively) but did not improve with ADO-mediated vasodilation (0.80 +/- 0.09 l/min in hyperoxia + ADO). Although a vasodilatory reserve in the maximally working quadriceps muscle group may have been evidenced by increased leg vascular conductance after ADO infusion beyond that observed in hyperoxia (increased blood flow but no change in blood pressure), we recognize the possibility that the ADO infusion may have provoked vasodilation in nonexercising tissue of this limb. Together, these findings imply that maximally exercising skeletal muscle may maintain some vasodilatory capacity, but the lack of improvement in leg .VO(2 max) with significantly increased O(2) delivery (hyperoxia + ADO), with a degree of uncertainty as to the site of this dilation, suggests an ADO-induced mismatch between O(2) consumption and blood flow in the exercising limb.
为了进一步探究运动训练的骨骼肌中最大耗氧量((\dot{V}O_2)max)的限制因素,六名自行车运动员在低氧(12%氧气)、高氧(100%氧气)以及高氧+股动脉输注腺苷(ADO)且工作率为最大工作率(WR(max))的80%的条件下,进行了分级膝关节伸展运动直至最大工作率。通过动脉和静脉血样采集以及热稀释法血流测量,得以确定肌肉的氧气输送和耗氧量。在WR(max)时,氧气输送量从低氧状态(1.0±0.04升/分钟)逐渐上升至高氧状态(1.20±0.09升/分钟)以及高氧+ADO状态(1.33±0.05升/分钟)。腿部(\dot{V}O_2)max随氧气供应情况而变化(低氧和高氧状态下分别为0.81±0.05和0.97±0.07升/分钟),但在ADO介导的血管舒张情况下并未改善(高氧+ADO状态下为0.80±0.09升/分钟)。尽管在输注ADO后,最大工作的股四头肌组中的血管舒张储备可能已通过腿部血管传导性增加得以证明,且该增加超过了高氧状态下观察到的情况(血流量增加但血压无变化),但我们认识到ADO输注可能在该肢体的非运动组织中引发血管舒张的可能性。总之,这些发现表明,最大程度运动的骨骼肌可能保持一定的血管舒张能力,但在氧气输送量显著增加(高氧+ADO)的情况下腿部(\dot{V}O_2)max却未改善,且对于这种舒张的部位存在一定程度的不确定性,这表明在运动肢体中存在ADO诱导的氧气消耗与血流之间的不匹配。