Moffatt Barton, Elliott Carl
Center for Bioethics, N538 Boynton Health Service, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Winter;50(1):18-31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0009.
The use of ghostwriters by industry is subject to increasing public attention and scrutiny. This article addresses the practice and ethics of scientific ghostwriting. We focus on the type of ghostwriting that involves a pharmaceutical company hiring a medical education and communications company to write a paper favorable of their product, who then hires a well-known academic to publish it under his or her name without disclosing the paper's true origins. We argue that this practice is harmful both to the public and to the institutions of science and that it is not justified by an analogy to accepted scientific authorship practices. Finally, we consider ways to discourage the practice.
制药行业雇佣代笔作者的行为受到了公众越来越多的关注和审查。本文探讨了科学代笔的做法及伦理问题。我们关注的代笔类型是,制药公司聘请医学教育与传播公司撰写一篇对其产品有利的论文,然后该公司再聘请一位知名学者以其名义发表这篇论文,却不披露论文的真实来源。我们认为这种做法对公众和科学机构都有害,而且与公认的科学署名做法类比也无法为其正名。最后,我们考虑了一些抑制这种做法的方法。