Suppr超能文献

检测兴奋剂检查尿液样本采集过程中的操纵行为:一种确定相同尿液样本的多学科方法。

Detection of manipulation in doping control urine sample collection: a multidisciplinary approach to determine identical urine samples.

作者信息

Thevis Mario, Geyer Hans, Mareck Ute, Sigmund Gerd, Henke Jürgen, Henke Lotte, Schänzer Wilhelm

机构信息

Center for Preventive Doping Research - Institute of Biochemistry, German Sport University Cologne, Carl-Diem-Weg 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Aug;388(7):1539-43. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-1112-z. Epub 2007 Jan 27.

Abstract

Manipulation of urine sampling in sports drug testing is considered a violation of anti-doping rules and is consequently sanctioned by regulatory authorities. In 2003, three identical urine specimens were provided by three different athletes, and the identity of all urine samples was detected and substantiated using numerous analytical strategies including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with steroid and metabolite profiling, gas chromatography-nitrogen/phosphorus detector analysis, high-performance liquid chromatography-UV fingerprinting, and DNA-STR (short tandem repeat) analysis. None of the respective athletes was the donor of the urine provided for doping analysis, which proved to be a urine sample collected from other unidentified individual(s). Samples were considered suspicious based on identical steroid profiles, one of the most important parameters for specimen individualization in sports drug testing. A database containing 14,224 urinary steroid profiles of athletes was screened for specific values of 4 characteristic parameters (ratios of testosterone/epitestosterone, androsterone/etiocholanolone, androsterone/testosterone, and 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol/5beta-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol) and only the three suspicious samples matched all criteria. Further metabolite profiling regarding indicated medications and high-performance liquid chromatography-UV fingerprinting substantiated the assumption of manipulation. DNA-STR analyses unequivocally confirmed that the 3 urine samples were from the same individual and not from the athletes who provided DNA from either buccal cell material or blood specimens. This supportive evidence led to punishment of all three athletes according to the rules of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Application of a new multidisciplinary strategy employing common and new doping control assays enables the detection of urine substitution in sports drug testing.

摘要

在运动药物检测中操纵尿液采样被视为违反反兴奋剂规则,因此会受到监管机构的制裁。2003年,三名不同的运动员提供了三份相同的尿液样本,通过多种分析策略对所有尿液样本的身份进行了检测和证实,这些策略包括气相色谱-质谱联用的类固醇和代谢物分析、气相色谱-氮/磷检测器分析、高效液相色谱-紫外指纹图谱分析以及DNA-STR(短串联重复序列)分析。相应的运动员均不是提供用于兴奋剂分析尿液的捐献者,事实证明这些尿液样本是从其他身份不明的个体采集的。基于相同的类固醇图谱,这些样本被认为可疑,类固醇图谱是运动药物检测中样本个体化的最重要参数之一。在一个包含14224名运动员尿液类固醇图谱的数据库中筛选了4个特征参数(睾酮/表睾酮、雄酮/异雄酮、雄酮/睾酮以及5α-雄甾烷-3α,17β-二醇/5β-雄甾烷-3α,17β-二醇的比值)的特定值,只有这三份可疑样本符合所有标准。关于指定药物的进一步代谢物分析以及高效液相色谱-紫外指纹图谱分析证实了操纵的假设。DNA-STR分析明确证实这三份尿液样本来自同一个体,而非提供颊细胞材料或血液样本DNA的运动员。这些支持性证据导致这三名运动员均根据世界反兴奋剂机构的规定受到处罚。应用一种采用常见和新型兴奋剂检测方法的新多学科策略能够在运动药物检测中检测出尿液替换情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验