Suppr超能文献

剖宫产与后续妊娠死产风险:一项针对英国人群的回顾性队列研究

Caesarean delivery and risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study in an English population.

作者信息

Gray R, Quigley M A, Hockley C, Kurinczuk J J, Goldacre M, Brocklehurst P

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2007 Mar;114(3):264-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01249.x. Epub 2007 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Two recent studies indicate an increased risk of stillbirth in the pregnancy that follows a pregnancy delivered by caesarean section. In this study, we report an analysis designed to test the hypothesis that delivery by caesarean section is a risk factor for explained or unexplained stillbirth in any subsequent pregnancy. We also report on the proportion of stillbirths in our study population, which may have been attributable to previous delivery by caesarean section.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

POPULATION

Linked statistical data set of 81 784 singleton deliveries registered in Oxfordshire and West Berkshire between 1968 and 1989.

METHODS

The crude and adjusted hazard ratios for stillbirth in deliveries following a previous delivery by caesarean section, compared with no previous caesarean, were estimated using Cox regression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Stillbirth.

RESULTS

The unadjusted hazard ratios for all, explained, and unexplained stillbirths were 1.54 (95% CI 1.04-2.29); 2.13 (1.22-3.72); and 1.19 (0.68-2.09), respectively. After adjustment for maternal age, parity, social class, previous adverse outcome of pregnancy, body mass indexand smoking the hazard ratios were 1.58 (0.95-2.63), 2.08 (1.00-4.31) and 1.24 (0.60-2.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancies in women following a pregnancy delivered by caesarean section are at an increased risk of stillbirth. In our study, the risk appears to be mainly concentrated in the subgroup of explained stillbirths. However, there are sufficient inconsistencies in the developing literature about stillbirth risk that further research is needed.

摘要

目的

最近两项研究表明,剖宫产分娩后的下一胎妊娠中死产风险增加。在本研究中,我们报告了一项分析,旨在检验剖宫产是任何后续妊娠中可解释或不可解释死产的危险因素这一假设。我们还报告了研究人群中死产的比例,这些死产可能归因于先前的剖宫产分娩。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

研究对象

1968年至1989年间在牛津郡和西伯克郡登记的81784例单胎分娩的关联统计数据集。

方法

使用Cox回归估计先前剖宫产分娩后与未剖宫产分娩相比的死产粗风险比和调整后风险比。

主要观察指标

死产。

结果

所有死产、可解释死产和不可解释死产的未调整风险比分别为1.54(95%CI 1.04 - 2.29);2.13(1.22 - 3.72);和1.19(0.68 - 2.09)。在调整产妇年龄、产次、社会阶层、先前妊娠不良结局、体重指数和吸烟因素后,风险比分别为1.58(0.95 - 2.63)、2.08(1.00 - 4.31)和1.24(0.60 - 2.56)。

结论

剖宫产分娩后的女性再次妊娠时死产风险增加。在我们的研究中,风险似乎主要集中在可解释死产的亚组中。然而,关于死产风险的现有文献存在足够多的不一致之处,需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验