Squeri R, La Fauci V, Cannavò G, Lo Giudice G, Sindoni L
University of Messina, Department of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Italy.
J Prev Med Hyg. 2006 Dec;47(4):142-5.
The aim of our research was to identify by bacterial genomic DNA analysis the prevalence of five different species of periodontopathogenic bacteria present in the subgingival biofilm, specifically: Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), Prevotella intermedia (Pi), Bacterioides forsytus (Bf), Treponema denticola (Td). For the analysis we used the systematic Multiplex-PCR-microdent kit with species-specific primers. We studied a group of 48 subjects, 18 males and 30 females, from 18 to 78 years of age. The initial clinical screening enabled us to select, among the group analysed, 24 subjects with signs of active periodontopathy (Group A) and 24 patients without identifiable clinical evidence of the disease used as the control group (Group B). Within the two experimental groups (A and B), the test was found to be positive in 75% of subjects from group A, whereas the test was found to be negative in all the subjects from group B. Our research shows that the Multiplex-PCR system is reliable. Furthermore, the sensitivity and simplicity of this technique, as well as the decrease in working times and the possibility of identifying non-culturable bacteria, since the presence of viable organisms is not essential, make this technique indicated for the simultaneous identification of periodontopathogenic bacteria and might, in perspective, provide a more effective clinical alternative to the techniques of bacterial typing of the subgingival plaque.
我们研究的目的是通过细菌基因组DNA分析,确定龈下生物膜中存在的五种不同牙周病原菌的流行情况,具体为:伴放线放线杆菌(Aa)、牙龈卟啉单胞菌(Pg)、中间普氏菌(Pi)、福赛坦氏菌(Bf)、具核梭杆菌(Td)。分析时我们使用了带有物种特异性引物的系统性多重聚合酶链反应-微牙试剂盒。我们研究了一组48名受试者,年龄在18岁至78岁之间,其中18名男性,30名女性。初步临床筛查使我们能够在分析的组中选出24名有活动性牙周病体征的受试者(A组)和24名无该疾病可识别临床证据的患者作为对照组(B组)。在两个实验组(A组和B组)中,发现A组75%的受试者检测呈阳性,而B组所有受试者检测均为阴性。我们的研究表明多重聚合酶链反应系统是可靠的。此外,该技术的敏感性和简便性,以及工作时间的减少和识别不可培养细菌的可能性,因为活生物体的存在并非必不可少,使得该技术适用于同时鉴定牙周病原菌,并且从长远来看,可能为龈下菌斑细菌分型技术提供一种更有效的临床替代方法。