Miner Andrew L, Losina Elena, Katz Jeffrey N, Fossel Anne H, Platt Richard
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):222-6. doi: 10.1086/509852. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
We investigated the relationship between the risk of deep infection and intraoperative use of laminar airflow systems and body exhaust suits during 8,288 total knee replacements performed in 256 hospitals. The overall 90-day cumulative incidence of deep infection requiring subsequent operation was 0.34% (28 procedures). In all combinations of laminar airflow systems and body exhaust suits, the 90-day cumulative incidence of infection requiring subsequent operation was 0.27%-0.43%. The risk ratio was 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-3.31) for laminar airflow systems and 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.62) for body exhaust suits suits. The risk was not statistically associated with use of either method, but infections were rare.
我们在256家医院进行的8288例全膝关节置换手术中,研究了深层感染风险与术中使用层流空气系统和排气服之间的关系。需要后续手术的深层感染的总体90天累积发生率为0.34%(28例手术)。在层流空气系统和排气服的所有组合中,需要后续手术的感染的90天累积发生率为0.27%-0.43%。层流空气系统的风险比为1.57(95%置信区间,0.75-3.31),排气服的风险比为0.75(95%置信区间,0.34-1.62)。该风险与这两种方法的使用均无统计学关联,但感染情况较为罕见。