Herremans M, Duizer E, Jusic E, Koopmans M P G
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Diagnostic Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Mar;14(3):276-80. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00312-06. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
Currently, diagnosis of acute hepatitis E virus (HEV) in patients is primarily based on anti-HEV immunoglobulin M (IgM) detection. However, several investigations suggest the use of HEV-specific IgA for diagnosing acute HEV infections. We evaluated two commercially available assays, an IgA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Diacheck) and an adapted immunoblot protocol (Mikrogen) for IgA detection and compared the performance in genotype 1- and 3-infected patients. The specificity of the IgA assays was high, with no positive reactions in a control group of 18 acute hepatitis patients who were negative for HEV. The sensitivity calculated in nine PCR-positive type 1-infected patients was 100% in both assays but was clearly lower in genotype 3-infected patients (n = 14), with sensitivities of only 67% and 57% for the ELISA and immunoblot assay, respectively. The lower IgA responses detected in genotype 3-infected patients could be caused by the use of only the genotype 1 and 2 antigens in the serological assays. Interestingly in two patients with possible infection through blood transfusion no response or intermediate IgA responses were detected, and this might confirm the parenteral route of transmission. In both the type 1- and type 3-infected patients both the IgA and IgM responses disappeared simultaneously. We conclude that IgA detection is of limited value for the serodiagnosis of acute HEV cases, particularly with genotype 3.
目前,戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)感染患者的诊断主要基于抗HEV免疫球蛋白M(IgM)检测。然而,多项研究表明,可使用HEV特异性IgA诊断急性HEV感染。我们评估了两种市售检测方法,一种用于检测IgA的IgA酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(Diacheck)和一种改良的免疫印迹法(Mikrogen),并比较了它们在1型和3型感染患者中的检测性能。IgA检测方法的特异性较高,在18例HEV阴性的急性肝炎患者对照组中无阳性反应。在9例PCR阳性的1型感染患者中计算得出的两种检测方法的灵敏度均为100%,但在3型感染患者(n = 14)中明显较低,ELISA和免疫印迹法的灵敏度分别仅为67%和57%。3型感染患者中检测到的较低IgA反应可能是由于血清学检测中仅使用了1型和2型抗原。有趣的是,在两名可能通过输血感染的患者中未检测到反应或检测到中等程度的IgA反应,这可能证实了经肠道外传播途径。在1型和3型感染患者中,IgA和IgM反应均同时消失。我们得出结论,IgA检测对急性HEV病例的血清学诊断价值有限,尤其是对于3型感染。