Neubauer Claudia, Hess Michael
Clinic for Avian, Reptile and Fish Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Avian Dis. 2006 Dec;50(4):620-3. doi: 10.1637/7660-060606R.1.
Three-day-old specific pathogen-free chickens (n = 24) located in isolators were inoculated orally with Helicobacter pullorum. One group (n = 12) was infected with a H. pullorum field isolate from human origin, another one (n = 12) with the American Type Culture Collection H. pullorum reference isolate 51801 originating from chickens. Both isolates were positive for cytolethal distending toxin, investigated using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A third group (n = 4) was kept as a negative control. Starting on day 7 of life, birds from each group were euthanatized at different time points up to 35 days. Various organ samples were taken aseptically and processed by culture and a H. pullorum-specific PCR. In the group infected with the human isolate the nucleic acid of H. pullorum was detected in the caecal tonsils and caeca of 12 and 11 birds, respectively. Live bacteria were cultivated from the caecal tonsils and caeca of five birds 24 and 31 days postinfection. Live bacteria were also isolated from the heart of one bird, whereas PCR had to be used to detect the nucleic acid of H. pullorum in the gallbladder of four birds. No live bacteria were reisolated at any time from birds infected with the avian isolate, but bacterial nucleic acid was detected in the caeca of five birds and in the gallbladder of one. In both groups neither live H. pullorum nor its nucleic acid were detected in the liver, spleen, and duodenum. Compared to the avian H. pullorum isolate the human isolate proved to be more invasive. No obvious clinical symptoms or disease was seen in the chickens during the entire experiment. The reisolation of live bacteria at the end of the experiments indicates that H. pullorum could enter the food chain even after early infection in birds. Furthermore, PCR was demonstrated to be helpful in tracing these fastidious bacteria.
将24只饲养于隔离器中的三日龄无特定病原体鸡经口接种鸡幽门螺杆菌。一组(n = 12)感染源自人类的鸡幽门螺杆菌野外分离株,另一组(n = 12)感染源自鸡的美国典型培养物保藏中心鸡幽门螺杆菌参考菌株51801。使用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,两种分离株的细胞致死性膨胀毒素均呈阳性。第三组(n = 4)作为阴性对照。从出生第7天开始,每组鸡在不同时间点(直至35天)实施安乐死。无菌采集各种器官样本,并通过培养和鸡幽门螺杆菌特异性PCR进行处理。在感染人类分离株的组中,分别在12只和11只鸡的盲肠扁桃体和盲肠中检测到鸡幽门螺杆菌核酸。感染后24天和31天,从5只鸡的盲肠扁桃体和盲肠中培养出活菌。还从1只鸡的心脏中分离出活菌,而必须使用PCR来检测4只鸡胆囊中的鸡幽门螺杆菌核酸。在感染禽类分离株的鸡中,任何时候均未重新分离出活菌,但在5只鸡的盲肠和1只鸡的胆囊中检测到细菌核酸。在两组中,肝脏、脾脏和十二指肠中均未检测到活的鸡幽门螺杆菌及其核酸。与禽类鸡幽门螺杆菌分离株相比,人类分离株的侵袭性更强。在整个实验过程中,鸡未出现明显的临床症状或疾病。实验结束时重新分离出活菌表明,鸡幽门螺杆菌即使在禽类早期感染后也可能进入食物链。此外,已证明PCR有助于追踪这些苛求菌。