Roberts Robert E, Roberts Catherine Ramsay, Xing Yun
Division of Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, P.O. Box 20186, 1200 Herman Pressler Dr., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Apr;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-13. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.12.010. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
This paper extends our knowledge of comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) and other psychiatric disorders by examining comorbidity of specific types of SUDs and risk of comorbidity separately for abuse and dependence. The research question is whether there is specificity of risk for comorbidity for different SUDs and whether greater comorbidity is associated with dependence. Data are presented from a probability sample of 4175 youths aged 11-17 assessed with the NIMH DISC-IV and self-administered questionnaires. SUDs outcomes are alcohol, marijuana and other substances in past year. Mean number of other comorbid disorders ranged from 1.9 for marijuana abuse to 2.2 for other substance abuse and 1.9 for marijuana dependence to 2.8 for other substance dependence. None of the abuse SUDs does not increase risk of anxiety disorders, but dependence does. Both abuse and dependence increased risk of comorbid mood disorders. Similar results were observed for disruptive disorders. Patterns of comorbidity varied by substance, by abuse versus dependence, and by category of other psychiatric disorders. In general, there was greater association of comorbidity with other disorders for dependence versus abuse. Marijuana is somewhat less associated with other disorders than alcohol or other substances. The strongest association is for comorbid disruptive disorders, regardless of SUDs category. Having SUDs and comorbid other psychiatric disorders was associated with substantial functional impairment. Females with SUDs tended to have higher rates of comorbid disorders, as did older youths. There were no differences observed among ethnic groups. When comorbidity of SUDs with other disorders was examined, controlling for other non-SUDs disorders for each specific disorder examined, the greater odds for dependence versus abuse essentially disappeared for all disorders except disruptive disorders, suggesting larger number of comorbid non-SUDs in part account for the observed effects for dependence.
本文通过分别考察特定类型物质使用障碍(SUDs)的共病情况以及滥用和依赖的共病风险,扩展了我们对物质使用障碍与其他精神障碍共病的认识。研究问题是不同SUDs的共病风险是否具有特异性,以及更高的共病率是否与依赖相关。数据来自对4175名11至17岁青少年的概率抽样,这些青少年通过美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表第四版(NIMH DISC-IV)和自填问卷进行评估。SUDs的结果包括过去一年中的酒精、大麻和其他物质使用情况。其他共病障碍的平均数量从大麻滥用的1.9种到其他物质滥用的2.2种,以及大麻依赖的1.9种到其他物质依赖的2.8种不等。滥用性SUDs均会增加焦虑障碍的风险,而依赖性SUDs则会增加。滥用和依赖都会增加共病情绪障碍的风险。对于破坏性行为障碍也观察到了类似的结果。共病模式因物质、滥用与依赖以及其他精神障碍类别而异。总体而言,与滥用相比,共病与其他障碍在依赖方面的关联更强。大麻与其他障碍的关联比酒精或其他物质稍弱。最强的关联是与共病破坏性行为障碍,无论SUDs类别如何。患有SUDs和共病其他精神障碍与严重的功能损害相关。患有SUDs的女性往往共病障碍的发生率更高,年龄较大的青少年也是如此。不同种族群体之间未观察到差异。当考察SUDs与其他障碍的共病情况,并针对每种特定障碍控制其他非SUDs障碍时,除破坏性行为障碍外,所有障碍中依赖与滥用相比的更高比值基本上消失了,这表明共病的非SUDs数量较多在一定程度上解释了观察到的依赖效应。