Biederman Joseph, Faraone Stephen V
Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit, Child Psychiatry Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004 Jun;27(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2003.12.004.
With the single exception of SUDs, no statistically significant gender-by ADHD interactions were identified in the multiple, outcomes evaluated. These results suggest that with the exception of SUDs, ADHD expresses itself similarly in boys and girls relative to comparison subjects of the same gender, indicating that ADHD-associated impairments are correlates of ADHD in both genders. Gender differences, such as the higher prevalence of symptoms of inattention and lower rates of comorbidity with disruptive behavior disorders, major depression, and learning disability, were identified among the ADHD subjects. Because these differences were caused by the main effects of gender rather than effect modification of ADHD by gender, these findings indicate that girls were at the same relative risk for these adverse outcomes as boys, but that female gender resulted in a different clinical presentation than that affecting boys. The single statistically significant gender-by-ADHD interaction identified was the association between ADHD and SUDs (alcohol or drug abuse or dependence). ADHD in females was a more serious risk factor for SUDsthan it was in males was an unanticipated and surprising finding. In light of ongoing concerns regarding ADHD as a putative risk factor of SUDs [12],this finding may indicate that girls are particularly at risk in early adolescence. Considering that the age of onset of ADHD and SUDs are separated by at least a decade [13.14], this finding would support targeting of substance abuse prevention programs to girls with ADHD.Furthermore, results show that although the combined type of ADHDwas the predominant type in both genders, girls with ADHD were twice as likely as boys with ADHD to manifest the predominantly inattentive type of the disorder. Because symptoms of inattention are more covert than those of hyperactivity and impulsivity, their higher prevalence in girls with ADHDrelative to boys also may explain partially the markedly higher male-to-female ratios in referred versus nonreferred samples of children withADHD. This work also showed that the pattern of transmission of ADHD and comorbid disorders is not influenced by the proband's gender. This is true for the type of disorder transmitted and the degree of risk to relatives. The finding of no interactions between proband ADHD diagnosis and pro-band gender clearly rejects the idea that gender differences in comorbid disorders can be attributed to genes or other familial causes. Prior work had shown this to be true for the diagnosis of ADHD in relatives [15-20].Thus, gender and ADHD appear to be independent risk factors for comorbid psychopathology and for the familial transmission of comorbid psychopathology. In summary, these results suggest that gender was a limited effect modifier of ADHD as a risk factor for ADHD-associated dysfunction in referred children and adolescents. Gender, however, did impact the clinical presentation of the disorder. This was largely because girls with ADHDwere less likely than boys to have comorbid disruptive behavior problems and higher prevalence of symptoms of inattention. Because these features could result in gender-based referral bias unfavorable to girls, more work is needed in referred and nonreferred samples of youth with ADHD to more fully assess this issue. These results also showed similar patterns in the familial transmission of comorbid disorders in families of boys and girls with ADHD. Thus, although ADHD is associated with the familial trans-mission of comorbid disorders, the pattern of transmission is not influenced by the proband's gender. These similar patterns provide further evidence for the idea that, when ADHD is diagnosed in girls it corresponds to the same disorder diagnosed in boys.
除物质使用障碍(SUDs)外,在评估的多个结果中,未发现ADHD与性别之间存在具有统计学意义的交互作用。这些结果表明,除SUDs外,相对于同性别对照对象,ADHD在男孩和女孩中的表现相似,这表明ADHD相关损害在两性中均与ADHD相关。在ADHD受试者中发现了性别差异,例如注意力不集中症状的患病率较高,以及与破坏性行为障碍、重度抑郁症和学习障碍共病的发生率较低。由于这些差异是由性别的主效应而非ADHD的性别效应修饰引起的,这些发现表明女孩与男孩在这些不良后果方面的相对风险相同,但女性性别导致了与影响男孩不同的临床表现。所发现的唯一具有统计学意义的ADHD与性别的交互作用是ADHD与SUDs(酒精或药物滥用或依赖)之间的关联。ADHD在女性中是SUDs比在男性中更严重的危险因素,这是一个意外且令人惊讶的发现。鉴于对ADHD作为SUDs潜在危险因素的持续关注[12],这一发现可能表明女孩在青春期早期尤其处于危险之中。考虑到ADHD和SUDs的发病年龄至少相隔十年[13,14],这一发现将支持针对患有ADHD的女孩开展药物滥用预防项目。此外,结果表明,尽管ADHD的混合型在两性中都是主要类型,但患有ADHD的女孩表现为主要注意力不集中型障碍的可能性是患有ADHD的男孩的两倍。由于注意力不集中症状比多动和冲动症状更隐蔽,它们在患有ADHD的女孩中比男孩中更高的患病率也可能部分解释了在转介与未转介的ADHD儿童样本中显著更高的男女性别比。这项研究还表明,ADHD和共病障碍的传递模式不受先证者性别的影响。对于所传递的障碍类型和亲属的风险程度而言都是如此。先证者ADHD诊断与先证者性别之间无交互作用的发现明确否定了共病障碍中的性别差异可归因于基因或其他家族原因的观点。先前的研究已表明亲属中ADHD的诊断也是如此[15 - 20]。因此,性别和ADHD似乎是共病精神病理学以及共病精神病理学家族传递的独立危险因素。总之,这些结果表明,在转介的儿童和青少年中,作为ADHD相关功能障碍危险因素的ADHD,性别是一个有限的效应修饰因素。然而,性别确实影响了该障碍的临床表现。这主要是因为患有ADHD的女孩比男孩更不太可能有共病的破坏性行为问题,且注意力不集中症状的患病率更高。由于这些特征可能导致不利于女孩的基于性别的转介偏差,因此需要在转介和未转介的ADHD青少年样本中开展更多工作,以更全面地评估这个问题。这些结果还在患有ADHD的男孩和女孩家庭中共病障碍的家族传递中显示出相似模式。因此,尽管ADHD与共病障碍的家族传递相关,但传递模式不受先证者性别的影响。这些相似模式为以下观点提供了进一步证据,即当在女孩中诊断出ADHD时,它与在男孩中诊断出的是同一种障碍。