Al Wazzan Khalid A, Al Hussaini Ibrahim S
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Feb 1;8(2):97-104.
The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of commercially pure titanium (PTi) and titanium-aluminum-vanadium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloys (TiA) on the final shade of low-fusing porcelain bonded to them and to compare the shade changes with those of three conventional metal-ceramic systems.
A titanium casting unit was used to cast PTi and Ti-6Al-4V alloy specimens followed by A3 shade low-fusing porcelain (Noritake) being bonded to them. Gold-based (AuA), palladium-based (PdA), and nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloys were cast with an automatic centrifugal casting machine, then A3 shade conventional porcelain material (Vita, VMK 95) was applied to them. Ten specimens of each metal were then fabricated. The CIE L* a* b* color coordinates of the specimens were measured with a spectrophotometer.
All alloys had significant color changes when compared with A3 shade tabs. The color differences from the shade tabs were 5.79 for the Ti-6Al-4V group, 6.46 for PdA alloy, 8.12 for AuA alloy, 8.15 for Ni-Cr alloy, and 12.58 for PTi. The specimens differed from the shade tabs primarily because of the differences in a* and b* coordinate values.
Predictable shade reproduction of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs) may be impaired by the underlying metal. The PTi had the greatest color differences among all the tested metal when compared with the shade tabs, whereas the Ti-6Al-4V alloy had the lowest. PTi is more likely to affect the final shade of low-fusing porcelain than Ti-6Al-4V alloy.
本研究旨在调查商业纯钛(PTi)和钛铝钒合金(Ti-6Al-4V)(TiA)对与之结合的低熔烤瓷最终色泽的影响,并将色泽变化与三种传统金属烤瓷系统的色泽变化进行比较。
使用钛铸造单元铸造PTi和Ti-6Al-4V合金试件,然后将A3色泽的低熔烤瓷(Noritake)粘结到试件上。使用自动离心铸造机铸造金基(AuA)、钯基(PdA)和镍铬(Ni-Cr)合金,然后在其上施加A3色泽的传统烤瓷材料(Vita,VMK 95)。然后为每种金属制作10个试件。用分光光度计测量试件的CIE Lab*颜色坐标。
与A3色泽标准片相比,所有合金都有显著的颜色变化。Ti-6Al-4V组与标准片的颜色差异为5.79,PdA合金为6.46,AuA合金为8.12,Ni-Cr合金为8.15,PTi为12.58。试件与标准片不同主要是因为a和b坐标值的差异。
底层金属可能会损害金属烤瓷修复体(MCR)可预测的色泽再现。与标准片相比,PTi在所有测试金属中颜色差异最大,而Ti-6Al-4V合金颜色差异最小。与Ti-6Al-4V合金相比,PTi更有可能影响低熔烤瓷的最终色泽。