Suppr超能文献

四种不同的金属烤瓷修复体饰面瓷系统与VITA经典比色板颜色匹配的分光光度法评估。

Spectrophotometric evaluation of color match to VITA classical shade guide of four different veneering porcelain systems for metal ceramic restorations.

作者信息

Fazi Giovanni, Vichi Alessandro, Corciolani Gabriele, Ferrari Marco

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2009 Feb;22(1):19-22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine by a spectrophotometric analysis the variations in color between the fabricated shade of four different porcelain systems and the intended shade when applied in a set thickness.

METHODS

Four porcelain systems (Duceram Kiss, VITA Omega, Wieland Reflex, Ivoclar IPS d.SIGN) for metal ceramic restorations were selected. Three disk-shaped (15 mm diameter, 0.3 mm thickness) specimens per group were made for three different shades of the A color scale of the Vitapan classical shade guide. On a Cr-Co alloy, 0.15 mm of porcelain opaque and 1.0 mm of translucent porcelain was applied. The porcelain stratification was executed according to the manufacturers' indications. The color measures were made by the clinical spectrophotometer Easyshade.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found among the ceramic systems examined. The recorded differences in color between A2 porcelain disks and corresponding VITA shade tabs were closer (mean delta E = 2.50) than those recorded for shade A3 (mean delta E = 3.84) and shade A3.5 (mean delta E= 3.94) (P<0.05).

摘要

目的

通过分光光度分析确定四种不同瓷系统制作的色度与以设定厚度应用时的目标色度之间的颜色差异。

方法

选择用于金属烤瓷修复体的四种瓷系统(Duceram Kiss、VITA Omega、Wieland Reflex、Ivoclar IPS d.SIGN)。针对维它经典比色板A色系的三种不同色度,每组制作三个圆盘形(直径15毫米,厚度0.3毫米)试样。在钴铬合金上,涂覆0.15毫米的瓷不透明层和1.0毫米的半透明瓷。瓷分层按照制造商的说明进行。颜色测量由临床分光光度计Easyshade完成。

结果

在所检查的瓷系统之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。记录的A2瓷盘与相应VITA比色片之间的颜色差异比A3色度(平均色差E = 3.84)和A3.5色度(平均色差E = 3.94)记录的差异更接近(平均色差E = 2.50)(P<0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验