踝关节内翻扭伤的急性治疗:固定治疗与功能治疗对比

Acute treatment of inversion ankle sprains: immobilization versus functional treatment.

作者信息

Jones Morgan H, Amendola Annunziato S

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:169-72. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802f5468.

Abstract

Inversion ankle sprains are one of the most common injuries in sports. Although these injuries are often considered minor, they can lead to persistent disability in athletes. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effect of immobilization versus early functional treatment on time to return to preinjury activity after inversion ankle sprain. Residual subjective instability, recurrent injury, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcomes. A systematic review identified 9 randomized controlled trials. Return to preinjury activity was less with early functional treatment in 4 of 5 studies that evaluated this outcome. Subjective instability was less in 3 of 5 studies. Similarly, reinjury rate was less in 5 of 6 studies. Patient satisfaction was not substantially different in the two studies that evaluated this outcome. Limitations of the identified trials included small sample size, heterogeneity of treatment methods, and lack of standardized outcome measures. However, based on our review the current best evidence suggests a trend favoring early functional treatment over immobilization for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains.

摘要

内翻型踝关节扭伤是体育运动中最常见的损伤之一。尽管这些损伤通常被认为是轻伤,但它们可能导致运动员持续残疾。我们对文献进行了系统综述,以评估固定治疗与早期功能治疗对踝关节内翻扭伤后恢复到伤前活动时间的影响。残余主观不稳定、再次受伤和患者满意度是次要结果。一项系统综述确定了9项随机对照试验。在评估这一结果的5项研究中,有4项研究表明早期功能治疗后恢复到伤前活动的时间更短。在5项研究中有3项研究显示主观不稳定情况较少。同样,在6项研究中有5项研究显示再次受伤率较低。在评估这一结果的两项研究中,患者满意度没有显著差异。已确定试验的局限性包括样本量小、治疗方法的异质性以及缺乏标准化的结果测量。然而,根据我们的综述,目前的最佳证据表明,在治疗急性外侧踝关节扭伤方面,早期功能治疗优于固定治疗存在一定趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索