Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦与缓释卡马西平治疗新诊断癫痫的比较。

Comparison of levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy.

作者信息

Brodie M J, Perucca E, Ryvlin P, Ben-Menachem E, Meencke H-J

机构信息

Epilepsy Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Neurology. 2007 Feb 6;68(6):402-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252941.50833.4a.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We report the results of a prospective study of the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam, a new antiepileptic drug with a unique mechanism of action, in comparison with controlled-release carbamazepine as first treatment in newly diagnosed epilepsy.

METHODS

Adults with > or =2 partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures in the previous year were randomly assigned to levetiracetam (500 mg twice daily, n = 288) or controlled-release carbamazepine (200 mg twice daily, n = 291) in a multicenter, double-blind, noninferiority, parallel-group trial. If a seizure occurred within 26 weeks of stabilization, dosage was increased incrementally to a maximum of levetiracetam 1,500 mg twice daily or carbamazepine 600 mg twice daily. Patients achieving the primary endpoint (6-month seizure freedom) continued on treatment for a further 6-month maintenance period.

RESULTS

At per-protocol analysis, 73.0% (56.6%) of patients randomized to levetiracetam and 72.8% (58.5%) receiving controlled-release carbamazepine were seizure free at the last evaluated dose (adjusted absolute difference 0.2%, 95% CI -7.8% to 8.2%) for > or =6 months (1 year). Of all patients achieving 6-month (1-year) remission, 80.1% (86.0%) in the levetiracetam group and 85.4% (89.3%) in the carbamazepine group did so at the lowest dose level. Withdrawal rates for adverse events were 14.4% with levetiracetam and 19.2% with carbamazepine.

CONCLUSIONS

Levetiracetam and controlled-release carbamazepine produced equivalent seizure freedom rates in newly diagnosed epilepsy at optimal dosing in a setting mimicking clinical practice. This trial has confirmed in a randomized, double-blind setting previously uncontrolled observations that most people with epilepsy will respond to their first-ever antiepileptic drug at low dosage.

摘要

目的

我们报告了一项前瞻性研究的结果,该研究比较了左乙拉西坦(一种具有独特作用机制的新型抗癫痫药物)与缓释卡马西平作为新诊断癫痫的一线治疗药物的疗效和耐受性。

方法

在前一年有≥2次部分性或全身性强直阵挛发作的成年人,在一项多中心、双盲、非劣效性、平行组试验中被随机分配至左乙拉西坦组(500mg,每日2次,n = 288)或缓释卡马西平组(200mg,每日2次,n = 291)。如果在病情稳定后的26周内发生癫痫发作,剂量逐渐增加,最大剂量为左乙拉西坦每日2次,每次1500mg或卡马西平每日2次,每次600mg。达到主要终点(6个月无癫痫发作)的患者继续治疗6个月的维持期。

结果

在符合方案分析中,随机分配至左乙拉西坦组的患者中,73.0%(56.6%)在最后评估剂量时≥6个月(1年)无癫痫发作,接受缓释卡马西平组的这一比例为72.8%(58.5%)(校正绝对差异0.2%,95%CI -7.8%至8.2%)。在所有达到6个月(1年)缓解的患者中,左乙拉西坦组80.1%(86.0%)和卡马西平组85.4%(89.3%)在最低剂量水平时达到缓解。左乙拉西坦因不良事件的撤药率为14.4%,卡马西平为19.2%。

结论

在模拟临床实践的环境中,左乙拉西坦和缓释卡马西平在新诊断癫痫的最佳剂量下产生了相当的无癫痫发作率。该试验在随机、双盲环境中证实了先前未经控制的观察结果,即大多数癫痫患者在低剂量时对其首次使用的抗癫痫药物有反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验