Stiell Ian G, Grimshaw Jeremy, Wells George A, Coyle Doug, Lesiuk Howard J, Rowe Brian H, Brison Robert J, Schull Michael John, Lee Jacques, Clement Catherine M
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Implement Sci. 2007 Feb 8;2:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-4.
Physicians in Canadian emergency departments (EDs) annually treat 185,000 alert and stable trauma victims who are at risk for cervical spine (C-spine) injury. However, only 0.9% of these patients have suffered a cervical spine fracture. Current use of radiography is not efficient. The Canadian C-Spine Rule is designed to allow physicians to be more selective and accurate in ordering C-spine radiography, and to rapidly clear the C-spine without the need for radiography in many patients. The goal of this phase III study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an active strategy to implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule into physician practice. Specific objectives are to: 1) determine clinical impact, 2) determine sustainability, 3) evaluate performance, and 4) conduct an economic evaluation.
We propose a matched-pair cluster design study that compares outcomes during three consecutive 12-months "before," "after," and "decay" periods at six pairs of "intervention" and "control" sites. These 12 hospital ED sites will be stratified as "teaching" or "community" hospitals, matched according to baseline C-spine radiography ordering rates, and then allocated within each pair to either intervention or control groups. During the "after" period at the intervention sites, simple and inexpensive strategies will be employed to actively implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule. The following outcomes will be assessed: 1) measures of clinical impact, 2) performance of the Canadian C-Spine Rule, and 3) economic measures. During the 12-month "decay" period, implementation strategies will continue, allowing us to evaluate the sustainability of the effect. We estimate a sample size of 4,800 patients in each period in order to have adequate power to evaluate the main outcomes.
Phase I successfully derived the Canadian C-Spine Rule and phase II confirmed the accuracy and safety of the rule, hence, the potential for physicians to improve care. What remains unknown is the actual change in clinical behaviors that can be affected by implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule, and whether implementation can be achieved with simple and inexpensive measures. We believe that the Canadian C-Spine Rule has the potential to significantly reduce health care costs and improve the efficiency of patient flow in busy Canadian EDs.
加拿大急诊科医生每年要治疗18.5万名意识清醒且情况稳定但有颈椎损伤风险的创伤患者。然而,这些患者中只有0.9%发生了颈椎骨折。目前使用X光检查效率不高。加拿大颈椎规则旨在让医生在开具颈椎X光检查单时更具选择性和准确性,并能在许多患者无需X光检查的情况下快速排除颈椎损伤。这项III期研究的目的是评估一项积极策略将加拿大颈椎规则应用于医生实际操作中的有效性。具体目标包括:1)确定临床影响;2)确定可持续性;3)评估性能;4)进行经济评估。
我们提议进行一项配对整群设计研究,比较六对“干预”和“对照”地点在连续三个12个月的“之前”“之后”和“衰减”期的结果。这12家医院急诊科将分为“教学”医院或“社区”医院,根据基线颈椎X光检查开具率进行匹配,然后在每对中分配到干预组或对照组。在干预地点的“之后”期间,将采用简单且低成本的策略积极实施加拿大颈椎规则。将评估以下结果:1)临床影响指标;2)加拿大颈椎规则的性能;3)经济指标。在12个月的“衰减”期,实施策略将继续,以便我们评估效果的可持续性。我们估计每个时期的样本量为4800名患者,以便有足够的效力评估主要结果。
I期成功得出了加拿大颈椎规则,II期证实了该规则的准确性和安全性,因此医生有改善医疗护理的潜力。尚不清楚的是,实施加拿大颈椎规则能在多大程度上实际改变临床行为,以及能否通过简单且低成本的措施实现实施。我们认为,加拿大颈椎规则有可能显著降低医疗成本,并提高繁忙的加拿大急诊科的患者流动效率。