• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估急救人员进行颈椎清除术的安全性:设计与方法。

Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology.

机构信息

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Room F-658, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 1;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1.

DOI:10.1186/1471-227X-11-1
PMID:21284880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3040719/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Canadian Emergency Medical Services annually transport 1.3 million patients with potential neck injuries to local emergency departments. Less than 1% of those patients have a c-spine fracture and even less (0.5%) have a spinal cord injury. Most injuries occur before the arrival of paramedics, not during transport to the hospital, yet most patients are transported in ambulances immobilized. They stay fully immobilized until a bed is available, or until physician assessment and/or X-rays are complete. The prolonged immobilization is often unnecessary and adds to the burden of already overtaxed emergency medical services systems and crowded emergency departments.

METHODS/DESIGN: The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and potential impact of an active strategy that allows paramedics to assess very low-risk trauma patients using a validated clinical decision rule, the Canadian C-Spine Rule, in order to determine the need for immobilization during transport to the emergency department.This cohort study will be conducted in Ottawa, Canada with one emergency medical service. Paramedics with this service participated in an earlier validation study of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Three thousand consecutive, alert, stable adult trauma patients with a potential c-spine injury will be enrolled in the study and evaluated using the Canadian C-Spine Rule to determine the need for immobilization. The outcomes that will be assessed include measures of safety (numbers of missed fractures and serious adverse outcomes), measures of clinical impact (proportion of patients transported without immobilization, key time intervals) and performance of the Rule.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 40% of all very low-risk trauma patients could be transported safely, without c-spine immobilization, if paramedics were empowered to make clinical decisions using the Canadian C-Spine Rule. This safety study is an essential step before allowing all paramedics across Canada to selectively immobilize trauma victims before transport. Once safety and potential impact are established, we intend to implement a multi-centre study to study actual impact.

摘要

背景

加拿大急救医疗服务每年向当地急诊部门转运 130 万例疑似颈部损伤的患者。这些患者中只有不到 1%有颈椎骨折,更少有(0.5%)有脊髓损伤。大多数损伤发生在护理人员到达之前,而不是在送往医院的过程中,但大多数患者在救护车中都被固定。他们保持完全固定,直到有床位可用,或者医生评估和/或 X 射线检查完成。长时间的固定通常是不必要的,这增加了已经不堪重负的紧急医疗服务系统和拥挤的急诊部门的负担。

方法/设计:本研究的目的是评估一种主动策略的安全性和潜在影响,该策略允许护理人员使用经过验证的临床决策规则(加拿大颈椎规则)对低危创伤患者进行评估,以确定在送往急诊部的过程中是否需要固定。这项队列研究将在加拿大渥太华进行,由一家紧急医疗服务机构参与。该服务机构的护理人员参与了之前对加拿大颈椎规则的验证研究。研究将纳入 3000 例连续的、警觉的、稳定的成年创伤患者,他们有潜在的颈椎损伤,将使用加拿大颈椎规则进行评估,以确定是否需要固定。评估的结果将包括安全性指标(漏诊骨折和严重不良结局的数量)、临床影响指标(无固定运送的患者比例、关键时间间隔)和规则的表现。

讨论

如果护理人员能够使用加拿大颈椎规则做出临床决策,大约 40%的所有低危创伤患者可以安全地运送,无需颈椎固定。这项安全性研究是在允许加拿大各地的所有护理人员在转运前选择性固定创伤受害者之前的必要步骤。一旦安全性和潜在影响得到确定,我们打算进行一项多中心研究来研究实际影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee1/3040719/248fe7c92c27/1471-227X-11-1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee1/3040719/248fe7c92c27/1471-227X-11-1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ee1/3040719/248fe7c92c27/1471-227X-11-1-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology.评估急救人员进行颈椎清除术的安全性:设计与方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 1;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-1.
2
Pragmatic Strategy Empowering Paramedics to Assess Low-Risk Trauma Patients With the Canadian C-Spine Rule and Selectively Transport Them Without Immobilization: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.实用策略助力护理人员运用加拿大颈椎规则评估低风险创伤患者并选择性地在不固定的情况下转运他们:阶梯楔形整群随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 1;9(6):e16966. doi: 10.2196/16966.
3
The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.护理人员对加拿大颈椎规则进行的院外验证。
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):663-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
4
Implementation of the Modified Canadian C-Spine Rule by Paramedics.实施改良后的加拿大颈椎规则(Canadian C-Spine Rule)由急救人员执行。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;81(2):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.441. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
A Multicenter Program to Implement the Canadian C-Spine Rule by Emergency Department Triage Nurses.多中心项目:急诊分诊护士实施加拿大颈椎规则。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;72(4):333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.033. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
Evaluating the paramedic application of the prehospital Canadian C-Spine Rule in sport-related injuries.评估院前加拿大颈椎规则在与运动相关的损伤中的急救医疗应用。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):356-364. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00086-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.用于清醒且病情稳定的创伤患者的加拿大颈椎影像学检查规则。
JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1841-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.15.1841.
8
A matched-pair cluster design study protocol to evaluate implementation of the Canadian C-spine rule in hospital emergency departments: Phase III.一项用于评估加拿大颈椎规则在医院急诊科实施情况的配对整群设计研究方案:第三阶段。
Implement Sci. 2007 Feb 8;2:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-4.
9
Can emergency nurses use the Canadian cervical spine rule to reduce unnecessary patient immobilisation?急诊护士能否使用加拿大颈椎规则来减少不必要的患者固定?
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jul;14(3):133-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 30.
10
Spinal motion restriction: an educational and implementation program to redefine prehospital spinal assessment and care.脊柱活动限制:一项重新定义院前脊柱评估与护理的教育及实施计划。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):429-32. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.869643. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Awareness Levels Regarding Cervical Spine Injury and the Suitable First Aid Response Among Adults in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯麦加成年人对颈椎损伤的认知水平及合适的急救反应
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 17;17:6253-6267. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S482337. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating the paramedic application of the prehospital Canadian C-Spine Rule in sport-related injuries.评估院前加拿大颈椎规则在与运动相关的损伤中的急救医疗应用。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):356-364. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00086-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
[Pediatric spine trauma-Results of a German national multicenter study including 367 patients].

本文引用的文献

1
Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.多中心前瞻性验证分诊护士在急诊科使用加拿大颈椎规则。
CMAJ. 2010 Aug 10;182(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091430. Epub 2010 May 10.
2
Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial.加拿大颈椎规则的实施:前瞻性12中心整群随机试验。
BMJ. 2009 Oct 29;339:b4146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4146.
3
The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.护理人员对加拿大颈椎规则进行的院外验证。
[小儿脊柱创伤——一项纳入367例患者的德国全国多中心研究结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2020 Apr;123(4):280-288. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00771-0.
4
Systematic scoping review protocol for clinical prediction rules (CPRs) in the management of patients with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤患者管理中临床预测规则(CPRs)的系统范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 1;9(1):e025076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025076.
5
Patient and paramedic engagement in prehospital emergency medicine research.患者及护理人员参与院前急救医学研究。
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S48-S49. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180352.
6
The epidemiology of pre-hospital potential spinal cord injuries in Victoria, Australia: a six year retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚维多利亚州院前潜在脊髓损伤的流行病学:一项为期六年的回顾性队列研究。
Inj Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;3(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0089-0. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
7
Development of a new Emergency Medicine Spinal Immobilization Protocol for trauma patients and a test of applicability by German emergency care providers.为创伤患者制定新的急诊医学脊柱固定方案并由德国急救人员进行适用性测试。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 May 14;24:71. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0267-7.
8
Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma.德国护理人员在脊柱创伤患者院前治疗方面的专业技能。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Jun;43(3):371-376. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0682-5. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
[Interface between preclinical and clinical trauma care: Analysis of the processes in a trauma network].[临床前与临床创伤护理之间的接口:创伤网络中的流程分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 Aug;118(8):657-65. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0024-9.
10
Comparison of three prehospital cervical spine protocols for missed injuries.三种院前颈椎损伤漏诊方案的比较。
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;15(4):471-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.2.19244.
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;54(5):663-671.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
4
Urban emergency department overcrowding: defining the problem and eliminating misconceptions.城市急诊科人满为患:定义问题并消除误解。
CJEM. 2002 Mar;4(2):76-83. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500006163.
5
Prospective performance assessment of an out-of-hospital protocol for selective spine immobilization using clinical spine clearance criteria.使用临床脊柱清除标准对院外选择性脊柱固定方案进行前瞻性性能评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;46(2):123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.004.
6
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2002年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2004 Mar 18(340):1-34.
7
Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments.加拿大急诊科对颈椎X线摄影采用NEXUS低风险标准的回顾性应用。
Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Apr;43(4):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.10.036.
8
The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma.加拿大颈椎规则与NEXUS低风险标准在创伤患者中的应用比较
N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 25;349(26):2510-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031375.
9
Can emergency department triage nurses appropriately utilize the Ottawa Knee Rules to order radiographs?-An implementation trial.急诊科分诊护士能否恰当地运用渥太华膝关节规则来开具X光检查单?一项实施试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;10(2):146-50. doi: 10.1197/aemj.10.2.146.
10
Multicenter prospective validation of prehospital clinical spinal clearance criteria.院前临床脊柱检查标准的多中心前瞻性验证
J Trauma. 2002 Oct;53(4):744-50. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200210000-00021.