Frohm Anna, Saartok Tönu, Halvorsen Kjartan, Renström Per
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine & Stockholm Sport Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Br J Sports Med. 2007 Jul;41(7):e7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.032599. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
To compare the efficacy and safety of two eccentric rehabilitation protocols for patients with symptomatic patellar tendinopathy. A new eccentric overload training device was compared with the present standard eccentric rehabilitation programme on a decline board.
Prospective, randomised clinical trial.
Sports rehabilitation clinic, university sports laboratory, supplemented with home exercises.
20 competitive and recreational athletes, all with clinical diagnosis of patellar tendinopathy, verified by MRI or ultrasound imaging.
A 12-week rehabilitation period, either with bilateral eccentric overload strength training using the Bromsman device twice a week or with unilateral eccentric body load training using a decline board twice a week, supplemented with daily home exercises.
The primary outcome was pain and function, assessed by the Swedish Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment for Patella (VISA-P) score. Secondary outcome measures were isokinetic muscle torque, dynamic function and muscle flexibility, as well as pain level estimations using visual analogue scale (VAS). Side effects were registered.
Both treatment groups improved in the short term according to the VISA-P scores during the 12-week rehabilitation period. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of pain and function. After a 3-month rehabilitation period, most patients could be regarded as improved enough to be able to return to training and sports. No serious side effects were detected in either group.
In patients with patellar tendinopathy pain, two-legged eccentric overload training twice per week, using the new device (Bromsman), was as efficient and safe as the present standard daily eccentric one-legged rehabilitation-training regimen using a decline board.
比较两种离心康复方案对有症状的髌腱病患者的疗效和安全性。将一种新型离心超负荷训练设备与目前标准的在斜板上进行的离心康复方案进行比较。
前瞻性随机临床试验。
运动康复诊所、大学运动实验室,并辅以家庭锻炼。
20名竞技和休闲运动员,均经MRI或超声成像确诊为髌腱病。
为期12周的康复期,每周两次使用布罗斯曼设备进行双侧离心超负荷力量训练,或每周两次使用斜板进行单侧离心身体负荷训练,并辅以每日家庭锻炼。
主要观察指标为疼痛和功能,通过瑞典维多利亚运动髌股评估量表(VISA-P)评分进行评估。次要观察指标包括等速肌肉扭矩、动态功能和肌肉柔韧性,以及使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行的疼痛程度评估。记录副作用情况。
在为期12周的康复期内,根据VISA-P评分,两个治疗组在短期内均有改善。然而,两组在疼痛和功能方面没有显著差异。经过3个月的康复期后,大多数患者可被视为改善到足以能够恢复训练和运动。两组均未检测到严重副作用。
对于髌腱病疼痛患者,每周两次使用新设备(布罗斯曼)进行双腿离心超负荷训练与目前标准的每日使用斜板进行单腿离心康复训练方案一样有效且安全。