Mattes Richard D
Dept. of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue Univ., 212 Stone Hall, 700 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059, USA.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007 May;292(5):G1243-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00510.2006. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
Evidence supporting a taste component for dietary fat has prompted study of plausible transduction mechanisms. One hypothesizes that long-chain, unsaturated fatty acids block selected delayed-rectifying potassium channels, resulting in a sensitization of taste receptor cells to stimulation by other taste compounds. This was tested in 17 male and 17 female adult (mean +/- SE age = 23.4 +/- 0.7 yr) propylthiouracil tasters with normal resting triglyceride concentrations (87.3 +/- 5.6 mg/day) and body mass index (23.3 +/- 0.4 kg/m(2)). Participants were tested during two approximately 30-min test sessions per week for 8 wk. Eight stimuli were assessed in duplicate via an ascending, three-alternative, forced-choice procedure. Qualities were randomized over weeks. Stimuli were presented as room-temperature, 5-ml portions. They included 1% solutions of linoleic acid with added sodium chloride (salty), sucrose (sweet), citric acid (sour), and caffeine (bitter) as well as solutions of these taste compounds alone. Participants also rated the intensity of the five strongest concentrations using the general labeled magnitude scale. The suprathreshold samples were presented in random order with a rinse between each. Subjects made the ratings self-paced while wearing nose clips. It was hypothesized that taste thresholds would be lower and absolute intensity ratings or slopes of intensity functions would be higher for the stimuli mixed with the linoleic acid. Thresholds were compared by paired t-tests and intensity ratings by repeated measures analysis of variance. Thresholds were significantly higher (i.e., lower sensitivity) for the sodium chloride, citric acid, and caffeine solutions with added fatty acid. Sweet, sour, and salty intensity ratings were lower or unchanged by the addition of a fatty acid. The two highest concentrations of caffeine were rated as weaker in the presence of linoleic acid. These data do not support a mechanism for detecting dietary fats whereby fatty acids sensitize taste receptor cells to stimulation by taste compounds.
支持膳食脂肪存在味觉成分的证据促使人们对可能的转导机制进行研究。一种假说认为,长链不饱和脂肪酸会阻断特定的延迟整流钾通道,从而使味觉受体细胞对其他味觉化合物的刺激变得敏感。在17名成年男性和17名成年女性(平均±标准误年龄 = 23.4 ± 0.7岁)中进行了测试,这些人是丙硫氧嘧啶味觉测试者,静息甘油三酯浓度正常(87.3 ± 5.6毫克/天),体重指数正常(23.3 ± 0.4千克/米²)。参与者每周进行两次约30分钟的测试,持续8周。通过递增的三择一强制选择程序对8种刺激物进行了两次评估。刺激物的性质在各周中随机安排。刺激物以室温5毫升的量呈现。其中包括添加了氯化钠(咸味)、蔗糖(甜味)、柠檬酸(酸味)和咖啡因(苦味)的1%亚油酸溶液,以及这些味觉化合物单独的溶液。参与者还使用通用标记量值量表对五种最强浓度的强度进行了评分。阈上样品以随机顺序呈现,每次之间进行漱口。受试者在戴鼻夹的情况下自行控制评分节奏。研究假设是,与亚油酸混合的刺激物的味觉阈值会更低,绝对强度评分或强度函数的斜率会更高。通过配对t检验比较阈值,通过重复测量方差分析比较强度评分。添加脂肪酸后,氯化钠、柠檬酸和咖啡因溶液的阈值显著更高(即敏感性更低)。添加脂肪酸后,甜味、酸味和咸味的强度评分更低或没有变化。在有亚油酸存在的情况下,咖啡因的两种最高浓度被评为较弱。这些数据不支持检测膳食脂肪的一种机制,即脂肪酸使味觉受体细胞对味觉化合物的刺激敏感。