Vande Vannet Bart, Hanssens Jean-Louis, Wehrbein Heinrich
Department of Orthodontics, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):60-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl063.
The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a difference in toxicity and loss of viability of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed human oral epithelium (RHOE) cell cultures induced by point-welded (PW), laser-welded (LW), and silver-soldered (SiS) orthodontic wires. Three types of soldered stainless steel (SS) wires: PW, LW, and SiS were prepared (n = 3) and subjected to multiple end-point analysis (MEA). Six pieces were cut from each wire. Each piece was placed on the triplicate cell cultures (RHOE model based on TR 146 cells). After 24 hours of topical exposure, the cell cultures were cut and stained with haematoxylin/eosin. Toxicity was assessed by evaluating the morphological changes and classifying these as mild, moderate, or severe. The in vitro cell cultures were subjected to a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay in order to quantify viability. Copper wires served as the control to determine severe toxicity and native cell cultures were used as a baseline. Untreated SS wire (0.9 mm) was included for comparison with the welded wires. Histological evaluation with respect to toxicity and measurement of viability in the 3D cell cultures showed no severe toxicity or loss of viability for any of the wires. The morphological ranking of the tested wires from mild to severe toxicity was: SS = PW = LW < SiS. MTT tests revealed the following mean viability values: native cell line (negative control) 98.1 per cent, SS 96.8 per cent, PW 95.5 per cent, LW 95.5 per cent, SiS 85.7 per cent, and copper wires (positive control) 51.2 per cent. Relative comparison between the different welding techniques tested on RHOE revealed, however, that LW and PW wires induced less toxicity/loss of viability compared with SiS wires.
本研究的目的是确定点焊(PW)、激光焊接(LW)和银焊(SiS)正畸丝对三维(3D)重建人口腔上皮(RHOE)细胞培养物的毒性和活力丧失是否存在差异。制备了三种类型的焊接不锈钢(SS)丝:PW、LW和SiS(n = 3),并进行多终点分析(MEA)。从每根丝上切下六段。每段丝放置在一式三份的细胞培养物上(基于TR 146细胞的RHOE模型)。局部暴露24小时后,将细胞培养物切开并用苏木精/伊红染色。通过评估形态变化并将其分类为轻度、中度或重度来评估毒性。体外细胞培养物进行3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四氮唑(MTT)试验以量化活力。铜丝用作确定严重毒性的对照,天然细胞培养物用作基线。包括未处理的SS丝(0.9 mm)以与焊接丝进行比较。对3D细胞培养物的毒性组织学评估和活力测量表明,任何一种丝均未出现严重毒性或活力丧失。测试丝从轻度到重度毒性的形态学排名为:SS = PW = LW < SiS。MTT试验显示以下平均活力值:天然细胞系(阴性对照)98.1%,SS 96.8%,PW 95.5%,LW 95.5%,SiS 85.7%,铜丝(阳性对照)51.2%。然而,在RHOE上测试的不同焊接技术之间的相对比较表明,与SiS丝相比,LW和PW丝诱导的毒性/活力丧失较小。