Teal Cayla R, Paterniti Debora A, Murphy Christi L, John Dolly A, Morgan Robert O
Baylor College of Medicine and the Michael E. Debakey VA Medical Center, Houston, USA.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Summer;27(4):13-23.
Medicare beneficiary knowledge about fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare versus managed care alternatives (MCA) has been studied extensively. However, these efforts might be compromised by lack of familiarity with common Medicare terminology. We used qualitative methods to examine beneficiaries' familiarity with Medicare Programs (FFS and MCA) and terminology. Twenty-one indepth, semi-structured beneficiary interview transcripts were analyzed through iterative review. Across sex, race/ethnicity, and benefits programs, participants found interview questions with Medicare terminology difficult to answer, potentially causing missing, incorrect, and inaccurate responses to interview questions. Assessment of beneficiary knowledge may be fundamentally impacted by absence of basic familiarity with Medicare Programs terminology.
医疗保险受益人对按服务收费(FFS)的医疗保险与管理式医疗替代方案(MCA)的了解已得到广泛研究。然而,这些努力可能会因对常见医疗保险术语不熟悉而受到影响。我们采用定性方法来研究受益人对医疗保险计划(FFS和MCA)及术语的熟悉程度。通过反复审查,对21份深入的、半结构化的受益人访谈记录进行了分析。在性别、种族/族裔和福利计划方面,参与者发现带有医疗保险术语的访谈问题难以回答,这可能导致对访谈问题的回答缺失、错误和不准确。对医疗保险术语缺乏基本熟悉可能会从根本上影响对受益人知识的评估。