• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帮助受益人做出医疗决策的家庭成员和朋友。

Family members and friends who help beneficiaries make health decisions.

作者信息

Sofaer S, Kreling B, Kenney E, Swift E K, Dewart T

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):105-21.

PMID:12500366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194732/
Abstract

People enrolled in Medicare often turn to family members and friends for help in making health decisions, including Medicare health plan choices. To learn how family members and friends participate in decisionmaking, what information they currently use, and what information they would like, we held eight focus groups in San Diego and Baltimore. Although responses were different in the two markets, participants in both cities reported receiving inadequate information and indicated they were largely unaware of available CMS-supported information. Beneficiaries want easy-to-use print materials targeted to their needs and opportunities to participate in seminars and receive personal counseling.

摘要

参加医疗保险的人在做出健康决策(包括选择医疗保险健康计划)时,常常向家人和朋友寻求帮助。为了了解家人和朋友如何参与决策、他们目前使用哪些信息以及他们希望获得哪些信息,我们在圣地亚哥和巴尔的摩举办了八场焦点小组讨论。尽管两个市场的反馈有所不同,但两个城市的参与者都表示收到的信息不足,并指出他们基本上不知道有哪些由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)支持的可用信息。受益人希望获得针对其需求的易于使用的印刷材料,以及参与研讨会和接受个人咨询的机会。

相似文献

1
Family members and friends who help beneficiaries make health decisions.帮助受益人做出医疗决策的家庭成员和朋友。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):105-21.
2
Beneficiary decisionmaking: the impact of labeling health plan choices.受益人的决策:健康计划选择标签的影响。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):63-75.
3
Medicare choices.
Caring. 1998 Aug;17(8):20-2.
4
Healthcare options for Medicare beneficiaries.
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2002 Apr;95(4):272-4.
5
Testing the effect of quality reports on the health plan choices of Medicare beneficiaries.
Inquiry. 2002;39(4):355-71. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.4.355.
6
Health plan decision making in the Medicare population: results from a national randomized experiment.医疗保险人群中的健康计划决策:一项全国随机试验的结果
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 2):133-49.
7
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.传统医疗保险与管理式医疗保险绩效比较。
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
8
Consumer's information needs: results of a national survey.消费者的信息需求:一项全国性调查的结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Winter;15(4):31-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.4.31.
9
Beneficiaries' perceptions of new Medicare health plan choice print materials.受益人对新的医疗保险健康计划选择印刷材料的看法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):21-35.
10
Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.医疗保险管理式医疗受益人的CAHPS调查中涉及的特殊问题。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS69-78. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Recommendation of Medical and Non-Medical Authorities on the Decision to Vaccinate against Influenza from a Social Vaccinology Perspective: Cross-Sectional, Representative Study of Polish Society.从社会疫苗学角度看医学和非医学权威机构的建议对流感疫苗接种决策的影响:波兰社会的横断面代表性研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 17;11(5):994. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050994.
2
The effect of depression and cognitive impairment on enrollment in Medicare Part D.抑郁症和认知障碍对医疗保险D部分参保率的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1433-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02348.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
3
Disenrollment information and Medicare plan choice: is more information better?退保信息与医疗保险计划选择:信息越多越好吗?
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):47-59.
4
Medicare beneficiary knowledge: measurement implications from a qualitative study.医疗保险受益人的知识:一项定性研究的测量意义
Health Care Financ Rev. 2006 Summer;27(4):13-23.

本文引用的文献

1
Elder care: a positive approach to caregiving.老年护理:一种积极的照护方式。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2000 Mar;12(3):97-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2000.tb00175.x.
2
Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?定性方法:它们是什么以及为何要使用它们?
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
3
The epidemiology of common late-life mental disorders in the community: themes for the new century.
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Sep;50(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.9.1158.
4
Consumers' knowledge about their health insurance coverage.消费者对其健康保险覆盖范围的了解。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1983 Fall;5(1):65-80.
5
Can Medicare beneficiaries make informed choices?医疗保险受益人能够做出明智的选择吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Nov-Dec;17(6):181-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.6.181.
6
The family's role in long-term care.家庭在长期护理中的作用。
J Gerontol Nurs. 1997 Sep;23(9):7-11. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19970901-06.
7
Incidence and prevalence of dementia in a multiethnic cohort of municipal retirees.
Neurology. 1997 Jul;49(1):44-50. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.1.44.
8
Gain in the caregiving experience: where are we? What next?护理经验的收获:我们目前的状况如何?下一步该怎么做?
Gerontologist. 1997 Apr;37(2):218-32. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.2.218.
9
Family caregiver education and training: enhancing self-efficacy.
J Case Manag. 1995 Winter;4(4):156-62.
10
Cognitive impairment and mortality in older community residents.老年社区居民的认知障碍与死亡率
Am J Public Health. 1994 Aug;84(8):1255-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.8.1255.