Cravedi Jean-Pierre, Zalko Daniel, Savouret Jean-François, Menuet Arnaud, Jégou Bernard
Inra, UMR 1089, Xénobiotiques, BP 3, 31931 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Med Sci (Paris). 2007 Feb;23(2):198-204. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2007232198.
In Europe, endocrine disruptors (EDs) have been defined as substances foreign to the body that have deleterious effects on the individuals or their descendants, due to changes in endocrine function. In the United States, EDs have been described as exogenous agents that interfere with the production, release, transport, metabolism, binding, action or elimination of the natural ligands responsible for maintaining homeostasis and regulating body development. These two definitions are complementary, but both indicate that the effects induced by EDs probably involve mechanisms relating in some way to hormonal homeostasis and action. EDs are generally described as substances with anti-oestrogenic, oestrogenic, anti-androgenic or androgenic effects. More recently, other targets have been evidenced such as the thyroid and immune system. Many different EDs are present in the various compartments of the environment (air, water and land) and in foods (of plant and animal origin). They may originate from food packaging, combustion products, plant health treatments, detergents and the chemical industry in general. In addition to the potential effects of these compounds on adults, the sensitivity of embryos and fetuses to many of the xenobiotic compounds likely to cross the placenta has raised considerable concern and led to major research efforts. With the exception of the clearly established links between diethylstilbestrol, reproductive health abnormalities and cancers, very little is known for certain about the effects of EDs on human health. Given the lack of available data, current concerns about the possible involvement of EDs in the increase in the incidence of breast cancer, and possibly of endometriosis and early puberty in girls, remain hypothetical. Conversely, the deterioration in male reproductive health is at the heart of preoccupations and progress in analyses of the relationship between EDs and human health. This literature review aims to describe the current state of knowledge about endocrine disruption, focusing in particular on the problem of food contaminants.
在欧洲,内分泌干扰物(EDs)被定义为体内的外来物质,由于内分泌功能的变化,这些物质会对个体或其后代产生有害影响。在美国,内分泌干扰物被描述为外源性物质,它们会干扰维持体内平衡和调节身体发育的天然配体的产生、释放、运输、代谢、结合、作用或消除。这两种定义是互补的,但都表明内分泌干扰物所引发的效应可能涉及与激素稳态和作用在某种程度上相关的机制。内分泌干扰物通常被描述为具有抗雌激素、雌激素、抗雄激素或雄激素作用的物质。最近,还发现了其他作用靶点,如甲状腺和免疫系统。许多不同的内分泌干扰物存在于环境的各个部分(空气、水和土壤)以及食物(植物和动物来源)中。它们可能源自食品包装、燃烧产物、植物健康处理、洗涤剂以及整个化学工业。除了这些化合物对成年人的潜在影响外,胚胎和胎儿对许多可能穿过胎盘的外源性化合物的敏感性引发了相当大的关注,并促使人们进行了大量的研究工作。除了已明确确立的己烯雌酚与生殖健康异常及癌症之间的联系外,对于内分泌干扰物对人类健康的影响,确切了解的还非常少。鉴于缺乏可用数据,目前关于内分泌干扰物可能与乳腺癌发病率上升以及女孩子宫内膜异位症和性早熟可能有关的担忧仍然只是假设。相反,男性生殖健康的恶化是内分泌干扰物与人类健康关系分析中的核心关注点和研究进展。这篇文献综述旨在描述有关内分泌干扰的当前知识状况,尤其关注食品污染物问题。