Suppr超能文献

睡眠日志数据与活动记录仪在睡眠障碍和创伤后应激障碍退伍军人中的可靠性比较

Reliability of sleep log data versus actigraphy in veterans with sleep disturbance and PTSD.

作者信息

Westermeyer Joe, Sutherland Roy John, Freerks Melesa, Martin Kay, Thuras Paul, Johnson David, Rossom Rebecca, Hurwitz Thomas

机构信息

Minneapolis VAMC Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(7):966-75. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.11.009. Epub 2007 Jan 19.

Abstract

The goal of the study was to assess inter-rater reliability of the daily sleep log (a self-rating) with actigraphy (an objective measure of sleep based on activity) in veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This analysis focused on time asleep and number of awakenings during bedtime. Study participants consisted of 21 veterans with a lifetime diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and current sleep disturbance symptoms. Data collection included study participants' daily charting of sleep logs and actigraphy (utilizing study participants' activity level). Data analysis included the following: (1) interrater reliability for the tabulation of self-reported sleep logs by two trained raters using 99 nights of sleep from 10 cases; (2) comparison of sleep log data versus actigraphic findings for sleep time during 241 bedtimes; (3) comparison of sleep log data versus actigraphic findings for awakenings during 241 bedtimes. Findings showed that the two raters had intraclass correlation scores of .801 for time spent asleep and .602 for time spent in bed-acceptable scores for tabulation of the sleep logs. Comparison of patients' sleep logs versus actigraphy for 241 nights showed that 10 out of 21 study participants had acceptable intraclass correlations of 0.4 or above for duration of sleep. However, sleep logs and actigraphic data on number of sleep awakenings showed poor intraclass correlation, with only 1 subject having an intraclass correlation greater than .30. In conclusion, these data strongly suggest that sleep logs do not reproduce actigraphic records in patients with PTSD even though the sleep logs were reliably quantified. Sleep logs especially under-count awakenings in PTSD patients with sleep complaints.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)退伍军人的每日睡眠日志(一种自评方式)与活动记录仪(一种基于活动的客观睡眠测量方法)之间的评分者间信度。该分析聚焦于入睡时间和就寝期间的觉醒次数。研究参与者包括21名终生诊断为创伤后应激障碍且目前有睡眠障碍症状的退伍军人。数据收集包括研究参与者对睡眠日志的每日记录以及活动记录仪记录(利用研究参与者的活动水平)。数据分析包括以下内容:(1)两名经过培训的评分者对10例患者99晚的自我报告睡眠日志进行制表的评分者间信度;(2)对241个就寝期间的睡眠时间,比较睡眠日志数据与活动记录仪记录结果;(3)对241个就寝期间的觉醒情况,比较睡眠日志数据与活动记录仪记录结果。结果显示,两名评分者对入睡时间的组内相关系数为0.801,对卧床时间的组内相关系数为0.602,这些分数对于睡眠日志的制表来说是可接受的。对241晚患者的睡眠日志与活动记录仪记录进行比较,结果显示,21名研究参与者中有10人在睡眠时长方面的组内相关系数达到或高于0.4,具有可接受性。然而,睡眠日志和活动记录仪记录的睡眠觉醒次数数据显示组内相关性较差,只有1名受试者的组内相关系数大于0.30。总之,这些数据有力地表明,即使睡眠日志能够可靠地量化,PTSD患者的睡眠日志也无法重现活动记录仪记录。睡眠日志尤其会少计有睡眠主诉的PTSD患者的觉醒次数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验