Suppr超能文献

复苏研究的设计与实施:特殊挑战及潜在解决方案

Design and implementation of resuscitation research: special challenges and potential solutions.

作者信息

Nichol Graham, Huszti Ella

机构信息

University of Washington, Harborview Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Box 359727, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2007 Jun;73(3):337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.021. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

Abstract

Evaluation of the effectiveness of resuscitation interventions is challenging. We describe these challenges, which include design, enrolment and analysis issues. Randomized trials establish if interventions work in predefined populations. "Efficacy" trials determine whether interventions work under ideal conditions. "Effectiveness" trials determine whether interventions work under usual practice conditions. These trials represent a trade-off between internal validity versus external validity. Randomized trials use random allocation of participants to interventions to produce study groups that are similar with respect to known and unknown risk factors, reduce bias in the allocation of participants, and assure that statistical tests have valid significance levels. In the emergency setting, there is a risk that treatment offered to control patients will be contaminated by providers' experiences of applying the intervention to patients receiving the experimental intervention. Frequently there is not time to obtain consent from a patient in an emergency setting. Exception from consent can be applied if certain conditions are met. Enrolment in a research study must be initiated quickly in an emergency setting or the patient will die or become disabled. In any trial, data can be used to explore different aspects of response to treatment: multiple treatments, subgroups, events; and interim analyses. We propose solutions to these challenges to help potential investigators through the myriad of difficulties in initiating trials in a complex environment. Design of simple trials that have adequate power enhances their external validity. Allocating groups of episodes to interventions by randomizing by clusters, rather than by individual patients reduces provider noncompliance. Waiver from consent for emergency research and use of novel technologies could facilitate enrolment despite time constraints. Rigorous statistical methods can be used to analyze multiple data without an excessive increase in the chance of a false-positive result.

摘要

评估复苏干预措施的有效性具有挑战性。我们描述了这些挑战,包括设计、入组和分析问题。随机试验确定干预措施在预定义人群中是否有效。“疗效”试验确定干预措施在理想条件下是否有效。“效果”试验确定干预措施在常规实践条件下是否有效。这些试验代表了内部效度与外部效度之间的权衡。随机试验通过将参与者随机分配到干预措施中来产生在已知和未知风险因素方面相似的研究组,减少参与者分配中的偏差,并确保统计检验具有有效的显著性水平。在急诊环境中,存在这样一种风险,即给予对照患者的治疗会受到提供者将干预措施应用于接受实验性干预患者的经验的影响。在急诊环境中,通常没有时间获得患者的同意。如果满足某些条件,可以适用同意豁免。在急诊环境中,必须迅速启动对研究的入组,否则患者将死亡或致残。在任何试验中,数据可用于探索对治疗反应的不同方面:多种治疗、亚组、事件;以及中期分析。我们针对这些挑战提出了解决方案,以帮助潜在的研究者应对在复杂环境中启动试验时遇到的众多困难。设计具有足够效力的简单试验可提高其外部效度。通过按集群而非个体患者进行随机化将发作组分配到干预措施中,可减少提供者的不依从性。尽管存在时间限制,急诊研究同意豁免和新技术的使用仍可促进入组。可以使用严格的统计方法来分析多个数据,而不会过度增加假阳性结果的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验