Smith Sherilyn, Hanson Janice L, Tewksbury Linda R, Christy Cynthia, Talib Nasreen J, Harris Mitchell A, Beck Gary L, Wolf Fredric M
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Mar;30(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/0163278706297333.
Tools to examine the effects of teaching interventions across a variety of studies are needed. The authors perform a meta-analysis of 24 randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of teaching on medical students' patient communication skills. Study quality is rated using a modified Jadad score, and standardized mean difference effect size (d) measures are calculated. Fifteen of 24 studies have sufficient data for analysis. Students' ability to establish rapport improves after teaching. The effects are large when the teaching intervention was small group discussion (n = 5) or giving structured feedback on a student-patient interview (n = 6). A similar effect of teaching is seen on student data gathering skills (n = 5). Teaching medical students patient communication skills using small group discussion or providing feedback on a student-patient interview results in improvement in student performance.
需要有工具来考察各种研究中教学干预措施的效果。作者对24项评估教学对医学生患者沟通技能影响的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。研究质量采用改良的雅达评分进行评定,并计算标准化均数差效应量(d)指标。24项研究中有15项有足够的数据用于分析。教学后,学生建立融洽关系的能力有所提高。当教学干预为小组讨论(n = 5)或对学生-患者访谈给予结构化反馈(n = 6)时,效果显著。在学生数据收集技能方面(n = 5)也观察到了类似的教学效果。采用小组讨论或对学生-患者访谈提供反馈的方式教授医学生患者沟通技能,可提高学生的表现。