• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用混合式学习方法对医学生进行动机性访谈培训:一项概念验证研究。

Training medical students in motivational interviewing using a blended learning approach: a proof-of-concept study.

作者信息

Erschens Rebecca, Fahse Bettina, Festl-Wietek Teresa, Herrmann-Werner Anne, Keifenheim Katharina E, Zipfel Stephan, Fallgatter Andreas J, Velten-Schurian Kerstin

机构信息

University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany.

Tübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1204810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204810. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204810
PMID:37546454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10400288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Difficulties in implementing behavior change in patients with chronic diseases are common in clinical practice. Motivational interviewing (MI) helps clinicians to support patients in overcoming ambivalence while maintaining self-determination. The inclusion of MI in German medical training curricula is still rare. Furthermore, the effects of systematic teaching of MI, especially via blended learning, have hardly been investigated.

METHODS

Medical students participated in three curricular events related to MI, consisting of instructional videos and theoretical and practical components in a blended learning format. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of teaching MI in students' medical education. A controlled, non-randomized study was conducted with an intervention group and a control group. Both groups completed questionnaires on their experience and knowledge related to MI, completed a knowledge test and rated their satisfaction with the course. MI was taught in the 6th semester of medical coursework as part of a psychosomatic course, in the 8th semester during a psychiatry course and in the 9th semester during a weekly psychiatry clerkship.

RESULTS

Data from the intervention group ( = 35) and control group ( = 14) were analyzed, with 65.7% of students participating in all three parts of the curriculum. Overall interest in learning MI was high, with  = 2.92 ( = 1.00). The results indicate a greater increase in knowledge over time in the intervention group. The majority (62.86%) stated that the curriculum was relevant to their future career. Free-form text responses indicated a high level of satisfaction with practical relevance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the usefulness of an MI curriculum for medical students. The integration of MI into medical curricula is a promising curricular addition to improve doctor-patient communication. Future research should address patient perceptions of MI competencies and the persistence of acquired competencies.

摘要

背景

在临床实践中,慢性病患者实施行为改变存在困难是常见现象。动机性访谈(MI)有助于临床医生支持患者克服矛盾心理,同时保持自我决定权。在德国医学培训课程中纳入MI的情况仍然很少。此外,系统教授MI的效果,尤其是通过混合式学习的效果,几乎未得到研究。

方法

医学生参加了与MI相关的三个课程活动,包括教学视频以及混合式学习形式的理论和实践部分。本研究的目的是调查在医学生医学教育中教授MI的效果。对干预组和对照组进行了一项非随机对照研究。两组都完成了关于他们与MI相关的经验和知识的问卷,完成了知识测试并对课程满意度进行了评分。MI在医学课程的第六学期作为身心医学课程的一部分进行教授,在第八学期的精神病学课程中教授,在第九学期的每周精神病学实习中教授。

结果

分析了干预组(n = 35)和对照组(n = 14)的数据,65.7%的学生参与了课程的所有三个部分。对学习MI的总体兴趣较高,平均分为2.92(标准差 = 1.00)。结果表明,随着时间的推移,干预组的知识增长幅度更大。大多数人(62.86%)表示该课程与他们未来的职业相关。自由文本回复表明对实际相关性的满意度很高。

结论

本研究证明了MI课程对医学生的有用性。将MI纳入医学课程是一项有前景的课程补充,有助于改善医患沟通。未来的研究应关注患者对MI能力的看法以及所获得能力的持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/390e145e1720/fpsyg-14-1204810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/36a53abec7ed/fpsyg-14-1204810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/2f22014ae3bd/fpsyg-14-1204810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/b95442d97b7d/fpsyg-14-1204810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/390e145e1720/fpsyg-14-1204810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/36a53abec7ed/fpsyg-14-1204810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/2f22014ae3bd/fpsyg-14-1204810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/b95442d97b7d/fpsyg-14-1204810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da9a/10400288/390e145e1720/fpsyg-14-1204810-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Training medical students in motivational interviewing using a blended learning approach: a proof-of-concept study.采用混合式学习方法对医学生进行动机性访谈培训:一项概念验证研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1204810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204810. eCollection 2023.
2
"A change would do you good": Training medical students in Motivational Interviewing using a blended-learning approach - A pilot evaluation.“改变对你有好处”:使用混合学习方法培训医学生进行动机性访谈 - 试点评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):663-669. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.027. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
3
Evaluating the Implementation and Impact of a Motivational Interviewing Workshop on Medical Student Knowledge and Social Cognitions Towards Counseling Patients on Lifestyle Behaviors.评估医学学生知识和社会认知方面的动机性访谈工作坊对患者生活方式行为咨询的实施和影响。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Apr-May;32(2):218-230. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1681273. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
4
Can motivational interviewing for dental settings be taught online? Results of an uncontrolled interventional trial.口腔环境下的动机性访谈能否在线上进行教授?一项非对照干预试验的结果。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2022 May;26(2):254-262. doi: 10.1111/eje.12698. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Teaching motivational interviewing in a blended learning environment.混合式学习环境下的动机式晤谈教学。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Jun;12(6):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Enhancing motivational interviewing training in a family medicine clerkship.加强家庭医学实习中的动机性访谈培训。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(1):80-4. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2014.979179.
7
Training nursing students in motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse: A mixed method study.针对护理专业学生进行酒精滥用动机访谈培训:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jun;125:105775. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105775. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
Concept and benefits of the Inverted Classroom method for a competency-based biochemistry course in the pre-clinical stage of a human medicine course of studies.针对人类医学课程临床前阶段基于能力的生物化学课程的翻转课堂方法的概念与益处。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc31. doi: 10.3205/zma001108. eCollection 2017.
9
Teaching brief motivational interviewing to medical students using a pedagogical framework.运用教学框架向医学生传授简短动机性访谈技巧。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2315-2319. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing Training for Third-Year Medical Students.针对三年级医学生的动机性访谈培训评估
Fam Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):132-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for motivational interviewing in educational settings among medical schools: a scoping review.医学教育环境中动机性访谈的证据:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05845-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Can motivational interviewing for dental settings be taught online? Results of an uncontrolled interventional trial.口腔环境下的动机性访谈能否在线上进行教授?一项非对照干预试验的结果。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2022 May;26(2):254-262. doi: 10.1111/eje.12698. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Evaluation of an online motivational interviewing training program for rehabilitation professionals: A pilot study.康复专业人员在线动机性访谈培训计划评估:一项试点研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Sep;35(9):1266-1276. doi: 10.1177/02692155211002958. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
3
Motivational Interviewing Training: A Case-Based Curriculum for Preclinical Medical Students.
动机性访谈培训:针对医学预科生的基于案例的课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Feb 12;17:11104. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11104.
4
Empowerment-oriented strategies to identify behavior change in patients with chronic diseases: An integrative review of the literature.以赋权为导向的策略识别慢性病患者的行为变化:文献的综合回顾。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):689-702. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Motivational interviewing quality assurance: A systematic review of assessment tools across research contexts.动机性访谈质量保证:研究背景下评估工具的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101909. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101909. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
6
Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.混合式学习与医学教育中的传统学习比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 10;22(8):e16504. doi: 10.2196/16504.
7
Peer Role-Play for Training Communication Skills in Medical Students: A Systematic Review.同伴角色扮演在医学学生沟通技巧训练中的应用:系统评价。
Simul Healthc. 2020 Apr;15(2):106-111. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000412.
8
Teaching Motivational Interviewing to Medical Students: A Systematic Review.向医学生教授动机访谈:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2020 Mar;95(3):458-469. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003011.
9
The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis.混合式学习对护生知识、技能和满意度的影响:Meta 分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Nov;82:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Blended learning for postgraduates; an interactive experience.研究生混合式学习:一种互动体验。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 30;19(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1717-5.